Gert Schout

528 total citations
42 papers, 372 citations indexed

About

Gert Schout is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Gert Schout has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 372 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in General Health Professions, 22 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Gert Schout's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (18 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (12 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (10 papers). Gert Schout is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (18 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (12 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (10 papers). Gert Schout collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Gert Schout's co-authors include Gideon de Jong, Tineke Abma, Jacques Zeelen, Barbara Groot, Joan Pennell, Cornelis L. Mulder, Elleke Landeweer, Mathieu de Greef, Cees P. van der Schans and Robert Vermeiren and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

In The Last Decade

Gert Schout

40 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gert Schout Netherlands 11 203 176 78 48 48 42 372
Mark Furlong Australia 10 98 0.5× 150 0.9× 69 0.9× 44 0.9× 26 0.5× 50 283
Jeanette Henderson United Kingdom 8 113 0.6× 80 0.5× 140 1.8× 63 1.3× 43 0.9× 15 313
Catherine Theodosius United Kingdom 6 169 0.8× 64 0.4× 195 2.5× 19 0.4× 35 0.7× 7 340
Mimi Choy-Brown United States 14 328 1.6× 94 0.5× 50 0.6× 22 0.5× 36 0.8× 36 425
Linda K. Bledsoe United States 11 134 0.7× 121 0.7× 126 1.6× 12 0.3× 30 0.6× 25 355
Tina Coldham United Kingdom 7 215 1.1× 60 0.3× 48 0.6× 70 1.5× 62 1.3× 13 317
Liz Rolls United Kingdom 11 152 0.7× 311 1.8× 144 1.8× 33 0.7× 145 3.0× 17 496
Denise Gammonley United States 10 157 0.8× 43 0.2× 90 1.2× 47 1.0× 34 0.7× 31 298
Janna C. Heyman United States 13 133 0.7× 110 0.6× 81 1.0× 31 0.6× 146 3.0× 28 354
Frances Gordon United Kingdom 10 165 0.8× 61 0.3× 66 0.8× 51 1.1× 97 2.0× 21 309

Countries citing papers authored by Gert Schout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gert Schout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gert Schout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gert Schout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gert Schout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gert Schout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gert Schout. The network helps show where Gert Schout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gert Schout

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gert Schout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gert Schout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gert Schout. Gert Schout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schout, Gert, et al.. (2021). Family group conferences for suicidal adolescents: Promising results from naturalistic case study research. Death Studies. 46(10). 2445–2455. 1 indexed citations
2.
Schout, Gert, et al.. (2019). Family Group Conferencing in Coercive Psychiatry: On Forming Partnership Between the Client, Social Networks and Professionals. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 40(6). 459–465. 8 indexed citations
3.
Schout, Gert, et al.. (2019). Family Group Conferences in coercive psychiatry: understanding relational dynamics by plugging in Bourdieu. European Journal of Social Work. 24(1). 137–150. 1 indexed citations
4.
Groot, Barbara, et al.. (2019). The Need for Making Contact in Times of Crisis. VU Research Portal. 3(3). 5 indexed citations
5.
Jong, Gideon de & Gert Schout. (2018). Evaluating Family Group Conferencing: Towards a meaningful research methodology. Child Abuse & Neglect. 85. 164–171. 4 indexed citations
6.
Jong, Gideon de, et al.. (2018). Involving Undergraduate Nursing Students in Participatory Health Research: Implications from the Netherlands. Journal of Professional Nursing. 34(6). 507–513. 27 indexed citations
7.
Jong, Gideon de, et al.. (2018). Family Group Conferencing as a Catalyst for Recovery and Ownership in Mental Health. Psychiatry. 81(2). 101–115. 3 indexed citations
8.
Groot, Barbara, et al.. (2017). Goede zorg bij crisis: Het belang van contact. Pure Amsterdam UMC. 1 indexed citations
9.
Jong, Gideon de, Gert Schout, & Tineke Abma. (2017). Understanding the Process of Family Group Conferencing in Public Mental Health Care: A Multiple Case Study. The British Journal of Social Work. 48(2). 353–370. 8 indexed citations
10.
Schout, Gert, et al.. (2016). Am I My Brother’s Keeper? Moral Dimensions of Informal Caregiving in a Neoliberal Society. Health Care Analysis. 25(4). 323–337. 4 indexed citations
11.
Jong, Gideon de & Gert Schout. (2016). The erosion of nursing in Dutch mental health care: a critique on the proliferation of psychologists. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 23(6-7). 449–454. 2 indexed citations
12.
Schout, Gert, et al.. (2016). The use of family group conferences in mental health: Barriers for implementation. Journal of Social Work. 17(1). 52–70. 10 indexed citations
13.
Bielderman, Annemiek, Gert Schout, Mathieu de Greef, & Cees P. van der Schans. (2015). Understanding how older adults living in deprived neighbourhoods address ageing issues. British Journal of Community Nursing. 20(8). 394–399. 1 indexed citations
14.
Jong, Gideon de, et al.. (2015). Enabling social support and resilience: outcomes of Family Group Conferencing in public mental health care. European Journal of Social Work. 19(5). 731–748. 17 indexed citations
15.
Schout, Gert, et al.. (2014). Pathways toward evictions: an exploratory study of the inter-relational dynamics between evictees and service providers in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 30(2). 183–198. 3 indexed citations
16.
Jong, Gideon de & Gert Schout. (2012). Researching the Applicability of Family Group Conferencing in Public Mental Health Care. The British Journal of Social Work. 43(4). 796–802. 8 indexed citations
17.
Jong, Gideon de & Gert Schout. (2011). Family group conferences in public mental health care: An exploration of opportunities. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 20(1). 63–74. 30 indexed citations
18.
Jong, Gideon de & Gert Schout. (2010). Prevention of coercion in public mental health care with family group conferencing. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 17(9). 846–848. 5 indexed citations
19.
Schout, Gert, Gideon de Jong, & Jacques Zeelen. (2010). Establishing contact and gaining trust: an exploratory study of care avoidance. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 66(2). 324–333. 35 indexed citations
20.
Schout, Gert. (2008). Zorgvermijding en zorgverlamming: Naar een praktijk theorie voor de openbare geestelijke gezondheidszorg. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(1). 15–15. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026