Anne C. Pisor

1.9k total citations
28 papers, 780 citations indexed

About

Anne C. Pisor is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne C. Pisor has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 780 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Social Psychology and 7 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Anne C. Pisor's work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (12 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers) and Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (6 papers). Anne C. Pisor is often cited by papers focused on Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (12 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers) and Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (6 papers). Anne C. Pisor collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Anne C. Pisor's co-authors include Daniel M. T. Fessler, Martin Surbeck, Michael Gurven, James H. Jones, Cody T. Ross, Carlos Navarrete, Colin Holbrook, Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Matthew M. Gervais and Elspeth Ready and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Anne C. Pisor

28 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers

Anne C. Pisor
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Sociology and Political Science 447
  • Social Psychology 267
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 121
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 109
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 88
Replace Daniel Major‐Smith with:
Daniel Major‐Smith United Kingdom
Michelle A. Kline United States
Kathryn Demps United States
James Broesch United States
Shane J. Macfarlan United States
Eleanor A. Power United States
Abigail E. Page United Kingdom
James Thompson United Kingdom
Thomas E. Dickins United Kingdom
James F. Eder United States
Daniel Major‐Smith United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Anne C. Pisor
Anne C. Pisor · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Anne C. Pisor
Anne C. Pisor · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Anne C. Pisor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne C. Pisor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne C. Pisor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne C. Pisor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne C. Pisor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne C. Pisor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne C. Pisor. The network helps show where Anne C. Pisor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne C. Pisor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne C. Pisor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne C. Pisor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne C. Pisor. Anne C. Pisor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 1
3 19
4 7
5 2
6 6
7 5
8 12
9 6
10 53
11 8
12 91
13 45
14 25
15 86
16 33
17 34
18 5
19 74
20 12

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026