Anne Boring
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Gender Politics and Representation
- Education top 5%
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Innovations in Educational Methods
- Online and Blended Learning
- School Choice and Performance
- Student Assessment and Feedback
Papers in
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 2
- Work-Family Balance Challenges 2
-
- Intellectual Property and Patents 3
- Co-authors
- Ghazala Azmat (1 shared paper)Philip B. Stark (1 shared paper)Kellie Ottoboni (1 shared paper)Josse Delfgaauw (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Public Economics (2 papers)Labour Economics (1 paper)Oxford Review of Economic Policy (1 paper)Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (1 paper)Applied Economics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceNetherlandsItaly
In The Last Decade
Anne Boring
10 papers receiving 372 citations
Anne Boring's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Gender Studies 123
- Education 179
- Safety Research 27
- Social Psychology 62
- Computer Science Applications 14
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Boring
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Boring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Boring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Boring more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Boring
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Boring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Boring. The network helps show where Anne Boring may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Anne Boring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 296 |
| 2 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 4 | Student evaluations of teaching are not only unreliable, they are significantly biased against female instructors | 2016 | 11 |
| 5 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 8 | Determinants of the United States' trade of pharmaceuticals | 2010 | 1 |
| 9 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 11 | Does Foreign Patent Protection Increase the United States' Trade of Pharmaceuticals with Developing Countries? | 2010 | 1 |
| 12 | 2023 | 0 |
About Anne Boring
Anne Boring is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 12 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (3 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers), Global trade and economics (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (123 citations), Education (179 citations), Safety Research (27 citations), Social Psychology (62 citations) and Computer Science Applications (14 citations). Anne Boring has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ghazala Azmat, Philip B. Stark, Kellie Ottoboni and Josse Delfgaauw. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Economics, Labour Economics, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization and Applied Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.