Anne Boring

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 373 citations indexed

About

Anne Boring is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Boring has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 373 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Anne Boring's work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers) and Innovation Policy and R&D (3 papers). Anne Boring is often cited by papers focused on Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers) and Innovation Policy and R&D (3 papers). Anne Boring collaborates with scholars based in France, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Anne Boring's co-authors include Ghazala Azmat, Philip B. Stark, Kellie Ottoboni and Josse Delfgaauw and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Public Economics, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization and Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

In The Last Decade

Anne Boring

9 papers receiving 356 citations

Hit Papers

Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne Boring France 5 180 121 72 62 41 11 373
Kristina M.W. Mitchell United States 4 219 1.2× 83 0.7× 80 1.1× 85 1.4× 9 0.2× 5 381
Amanda Bayer United States 9 268 1.5× 79 0.7× 68 0.9× 58 0.9× 120 2.9× 15 465
Lisa T. Stickney United States 9 59 0.3× 62 0.5× 114 1.6× 78 1.3× 21 0.5× 19 303
Xiangfen Liang United States 4 86 0.5× 199 1.6× 70 1.0× 120 1.9× 10 0.2× 6 371
Sophie Mahseredjian Canada 6 272 1.5× 46 0.4× 99 1.4× 26 0.4× 161 3.9× 13 442
Nirmala Kannankutty United States 5 96 0.5× 31 0.3× 43 0.6× 27 0.4× 49 1.2× 11 272
Jeffrey Bagraim South Africa 10 74 0.4× 46 0.4× 118 1.6× 71 1.1× 16 0.4× 16 450
Kenneth G. Wheeler United States 8 67 0.4× 76 0.6× 72 1.0× 57 0.9× 18 0.4× 11 327
James C. Rush Canada 6 86 0.5× 49 0.4× 30 0.4× 111 1.8× 19 0.5× 7 422
Charlotte H. Scott United States 3 398 2.2× 26 0.2× 136 1.9× 37 0.6× 42 1.0× 5 484

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Boring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Boring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Boring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Boring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Boring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Boring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Boring. The network helps show where Anne Boring may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Boring

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Boring. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Boring based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Boring. Anne Boring is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Boring, Anne & Josse Delfgaauw. (2024). Social desirability bias in attitudes towards sexism and DEI policies in the workplace. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 225. 465–482. 4 indexed citations
2.
Delfgaauw, Josse & Anne Boring. (2024). Social Desirability Bias in Attitudes Towards Sexism and Dei Policies in the Workplace. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
3.
Boring, Anne, et al.. (2023). Turning back the clock: Beliefs about gender roles during lockdown. Labour Economics. 84. 102363–102363.
4.
Boring, Anne, et al.. (2020). Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics. 193. 104323–104323. 29 indexed citations
5.
Azmat, Ghazala & Anne Boring. (2020). Gender diversity in firms. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 36(4). 760–782. 31 indexed citations
6.
Boring, Anne. (2017). 9. L’Entrepreneuriat des femmes : motivations et obstacles. Regards croisés sur l'économie. n° 19(2). 130–142. 1 indexed citations
7.
Boring, Anne, Kellie Ottoboni, & Philip B. Stark. (2016). Student evaluations of teaching are not only unreliable, they are significantly biased against female instructors. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 11 indexed citations
8.
Boring, Anne. (2016). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics. 145. 27–41. 289 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Boring, Anne. (2015). The impact of patent protection on US pharmaceutical exports to developing countries. Applied Economics. 47(13). 1314–1330. 5 indexed citations
10.
Boring, Anne. (2010). Determinants of the United States' trade of pharmaceuticals. Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine. 1 indexed citations
11.
Boring, Anne. (2010). Does Foreign Patent Protection Increase the United States' Trade of Pharmaceuticals with Developing Countries?. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026