Anna Williams

36 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Anna Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Human-Computer Interaction 305
  • Occupational Therapy 135
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 58
  • Safety Research 125
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 248
Replace Devva Kasnitz with:
Devva Kasnitz United States
Kathryn E. Ringland United States
LouAnne Boyd United States
Maitraye Das United States
Annuska Zolyomi United States
Aimi Hamraie United States
Laura Malinverni Spain
Abi Roper United Kingdom
Émeline Brulé United Kingdom
Karen Guldberg United Kingdom
Anna Williams relative to Devva Kasnitz United States Devva Kasnitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Devva Kasnitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Williams. The network helps show where Anna Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Williams Line = papers co-authored together Anna Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020100
2 202092
3 201876
4 202071
5 202268
6 201866
7 202046
8 201946
9 202239
10 202336
11 202128
12 199625
13 201924
14 201917
15 201816
16 202315
17 202114
18 202313
19 202111
20 20217

About Anna Williams

Anna Williams is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Education and Occupational Therapy, having authored 49 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (10 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (5 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers), Social and Educational Sciences (4 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (305 citations), Occupational Therapy (135 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (58 citations), Safety Research (125 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (248 citations). Anna Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Katta Spiel, Juan E. Gilbert, Cynthia L. Bennett, Os Keyes, Eva Hornecker, Judith Good, LouAnne Boyd, Kathrin Gerling, Jennifer Mankoff and Émeline Brulé. Their work appears in journals such as Disability & Society, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, American Ethnologist, Environment and Planning D Society and Space and Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact