Andrew Smith

519 total citations
45 papers, 251 citations indexed

About

Andrew Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Smith has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 251 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 9 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 8 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Andrew Smith's work include Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (5 papers). Andrew Smith is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (5 papers). Andrew Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Andrew Smith's co-authors include Jennifer Johns, Pierre‐Yves Donzé, William Hughes, Kevin D. Tennent, Andrew Popp, Ian Jones, Diego M. Coraiola, Leigh Sparks, Ludi Simpson and Bernardo Bátiz‐Lazo and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice and Journal of Management Studies.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Smith

42 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Smith United Kingdom 9 78 73 62 35 34 45 251
Mads Mordhorst Denmark 8 97 1.2× 126 1.7× 55 0.9× 34 1.0× 45 1.3× 19 326
Jon Press United Kingdom 9 103 1.3× 67 0.9× 44 0.7× 48 1.4× 30 0.9× 23 264
Max Saunders United Kingdom 9 49 0.6× 25 0.3× 102 1.6× 12 0.3× 18 0.5× 51 284
Michele Chwastiak United States 11 92 1.2× 62 0.8× 73 1.2× 36 1.0× 49 1.4× 15 415
Christopher W. J. Steele Canada 5 93 1.2× 126 1.7× 74 1.2× 24 0.7× 28 0.8× 14 265
Alex Faria Brazil 8 109 1.4× 108 1.5× 54 0.9× 10 0.3× 43 1.3× 13 268
Rowena Olegario United Kingdom 9 54 0.7× 23 0.3× 57 0.9× 85 2.4× 24 0.7× 17 249
Alberto Rinaldi Italy 10 89 1.1× 45 0.6× 60 1.0× 164 4.7× 27 0.8× 35 322
Andrew Spicer United Kingdom 7 51 0.7× 47 0.6× 118 1.9× 83 2.4× 61 1.8× 46 376
Hartmut Berghoff Germany 11 148 1.9× 139 1.9× 56 0.9× 93 2.7× 86 2.5× 50 430

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Smith. The network helps show where Andrew Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Smith. Andrew Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Burton, Nicholas, et al.. (2025). Firms as Quasi-Traditions: The Moral Backbone of Social Legacy. Academy of Management Perspectives. 40(1). 49–74. 1 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2025). How do firms manage ethically-contested organisational paradoxes? Insights from two historical case studies of modern slavery. Business History. 67(2). 629–657. 1 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Andrew. (2025). Taming the Octopus: The Long Battle for the Soul of the Corporation. Business History. 1–3.
4.
Csank, Adam, et al.. (2023). Understanding the historic legacies of empire from the timbers left behind: Towards critical dendroprovenancing in the British North Atlantic. Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes. 67(1). 124–138. 1 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Ian, et al.. (2022). Bourdieusian capital conversion during crises of socio-political legitimacy: Sponsorship of the arts by Barclays Bank, 1972 to 1987. Business History. 66(6). 1552–1579. 2 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2021). Historical Narratives and the Defense of Stigmatized Industries. Journal of Management Inquiry. 31(4). 386–404. 12 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2020). The defence of cosmopolitan capitalism by Sir Charles Addis, 1914-1919: A microhistorical study of a classical liberal banker in wartime. Business History. 64(9). 1666–1683. 2 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Andrew & Jennifer Johns. (2019). Historicizing Modern Slavery: Free-Grown Sugar as an Ethics-Driven Market Category in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Journal of Business Ethics. 166(2). 271–292. 27 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2018). Berle and Means’s The Modern Corporation and Private Property: The Military Roots of a Stakeholder Model of Corporate Governance. Seattle University law review. 42(2). 535. 5 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2018). Religiosity, emotional states, and strategy in the family firm: Edm. Schluter & Co Ltd., 1953-1980. Entreprises et histoire. n° 91(2). 98–125. 2 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2018). Prospects for a transparency revolution in the field of business history. Business History. 61(6). 919–941. 7 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2018). Ambiguous decolonisation: a postcolonial reading of the IHRM strategy of the Burmah Oil Company. Business History. 63(1). 98–126. 8 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2017). “Berle and Means’ The Modern Corporation: a Stakeholder Model of Corporate Governance. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2017(1). 11766–11766. 1 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2016). Canadian Entrepreneurs and the Preservation of the Capitalist Peace in the North Atlantic Triangle in the Civil War Era, 1861–1871. Enterprise & Society. 17(3). 515–545. 1 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2015). Toward polyphonic constitutive historicism: a new research agenda for management historians. Management & Organizational History. 11(2). 236–251. 16 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Andrew. (2015). The winds of change and the end of the Comprador System in the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation. Business History. 58(2). 179–206. 6 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Andrew. (2014). The Use and Abuse of Environmental Knowledge: A Bloomington School Interpretation of the Canadian Fisheries Act of 1868. The Review of Austrian Economics. 29(2). 139–161. 1 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Andrew. (2013). Patriotism, Self-Interest and the ‘Empire Effect’: Britishness and British Decisions to Invest in Canada, 1867–1914. The Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History. 41(1). 59–80. 6 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Andrew. (2010). Ruins, Radicals and Reactionaries: John Clare's Enclosure Elegies. 37. 1 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Andrew. (2008). British Businessmen and Canadian Confederation: Constitution Making in an Era of Anglo-Globalization. Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university). 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026