Andrew Spicer
- History top 2%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 16
- Mormonism, Religion, and History 2
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Accounting top 10%
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 5
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 3
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 3
-
- Religious Tourism and Spaces 3
-
- Cinema and Media Studies 3
-
- Religious Education and Schools 2
- Co-authors
- Gerald A. McDermottBruce KogutNicholas TerpstraWill CosterSarah HamiltonWilliam G. NaphyJudith PollmannCharlotte Methuen
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Andrew Spicer
32 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Business and International Management 18
- History 89
- Strategy and Management 118
- Accounting 82
- Management of Technology and Innovation 41
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Spicer
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Spicer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Spicer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Spicer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Spicer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Spicer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Spicer. The network helps show where Andrew Spicer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Spicer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LGBT+ Histories and Historians | 2020 | 1 |
| 2 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 8 | Ritual and violence : Natalie Zemon Davis and early modern France | 2012 | 2 |
| 9 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 12 | Man in the Moon (review) | 2011 | 2 |
| 13 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 15 | Defining the Holy: Sacred Space in Medieval and Early Modern Europe | 2006 | 19 |
| 16 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 4 |
About Andrew Spicer
Andrew Spicer is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science and Museology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (16 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers) and Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (18 citations), History (89 citations) and Strategy and Management (118 citations). Andrew Spicer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gerald A. McDermott, Bruce Kogut, Nicholas Terpstra, Will Coster, Sarah Hamilton, William G. Naphy, Judith Pollmann, Charlotte Methuen, Penny Roberts and Peter Catterall.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.