Eliot Michaelson

458 total citations
26 papers, 209 citations indexed

About

Eliot Michaelson is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Eliot Michaelson has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 209 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 12 papers in Philosophy and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Eliot Michaelson's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers). Eliot Michaelson is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers). Eliot Michaelson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Eliot Michaelson's co-authors include Rachel Sterken, Andreas Stokke, Michael Brownstein, Jonathan Cohen, Mark Textor, Jonathan Cohen, Robert Mark Simpson, Andrew Reisner and Matti Eklund and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Philosophical Quarterly and Noûs.

In The Last Decade

Eliot Michaelson

21 papers receiving 194 citations

Peers

Eliot Michaelson
Paul Saka United States
Siobhan Chapman United Kingdom
Tim Kenyon Canada
Chris Ranalli Netherlands
Kevin Dorst United States
Eliot Michaelson
Citations per year, relative to Eliot Michaelson Eliot Michaelson (= 1×) peers Teresa Marques

Countries citing papers authored by Eliot Michaelson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eliot Michaelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eliot Michaelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eliot Michaelson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eliot Michaelson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eliot Michaelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eliot Michaelson. The network helps show where Eliot Michaelson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eliot Michaelson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eliot Michaelson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eliot Michaelson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eliot Michaelson. Eliot Michaelson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Michaelson, Eliot, et al.. (2025). Fregean Socialism. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 99(1). 75–96.
2.
Michaelson, Eliot. (2024). The Inbetweeners: On Theories of Language Neither Ideal nor Non-Ideal. Analysis. 1 indexed citations
3.
Michaelson, Eliot. (2024). What is the proper function of language?. Inquiry. 67(8). 2791–2814. 4 indexed citations
4.
Michaelson, Eliot. (2023). Unspeakable names. Synthese. 201(2). 3 indexed citations
5.
Michaelson, Eliot. (2023). The Vagaries of References. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(0). 3 indexed citations
6.
Michaelson, Eliot. (2023). Talking About: An Intentionalist Theory of Reference. The Philosophical Quarterly. 75(1). 338–341. 1 indexed citations
7.
Eklund, Matti, et al.. (2022). Should moral intuitionism go social?. Noûs. 57(4). 973–985.
8.
Michaelson, Eliot & Mark Textor. (2021). Tolerating Sense Variation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 101(1). 182–196. 3 indexed citations
9.
Michaelson, Eliot, et al.. (2021). Meta-Metasemantics, or the Quest for the One True Metasemantics. The Philosophical Quarterly. 72(1). 135–154. 4 indexed citations
10.
Michaelson, Eliot & Jonathan Cohen. (2020). Daylight savings: what an answer to the perceptual variation problem cannot be. Philosophical Studies. 178(3). 833–843. 1 indexed citations
11.
Michaelson, Eliot, et al.. (2020). Who’s Your Ideal Listener?. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 99(2). 257–270. 4 indexed citations
12.
Simpson, Robert Mark & Eliot Michaelson. (2020). The big shill. Ratio. 33(4). 269–280.
13.
Michaelson, Eliot, et al.. (2019). Discourse and method. Linguistics and Philosophy. 43(2). 119–138. 6 indexed citations
14.
Michaelson, Eliot, et al.. (2019). Why we should keep talking about fake news. Inquiry. 65(4). 471–487. 23 indexed citations
15.
Michaelson, Eliot, et al.. (2019). What's New About Fake News?. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy. 16(2). 32 indexed citations
16.
Michaelson, Eliot. (2018). The Lies We Tell Each Other Together. Oxford University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
17.
Michaelson, Eliot. (2016). The Lying Test. Mind & Language. 31(4). 470–499. 23 indexed citations
18.
Michaelson, Eliot, et al.. (2016). Introduction forInquirySymposium onImagination and Convention. Inquiry. 59(2). 139–144. 1 indexed citations
19.
Brownstein, Michael & Eliot Michaelson. (2015). Doing without believing: Intellectualism, knowledge-how, and belief-attribution. Synthese. 193(9). 2815–2836. 25 indexed citations
20.
Michaelson, Eliot. (2013). This and That: A Theory of Reference for Names, Demonstratives, and Things in Between. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026