Andrea C. Vial

871 total citations
19 papers, 503 citations indexed

About

Andrea C. Vial is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrea C. Vial has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 503 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Gender Studies, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Andrea C. Vial's work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers). Andrea C. Vial is often cited by papers focused on Gender Diversity and Inequality (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers). Andrea C. Vial collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Arab Emirates and Netherlands. Andrea C. Vial's co-authors include Victoria L. Brescoll, Jaime L. Napier, Tyrel J. Starks, Jeffrey T. Parsons, Tyler G. Okimoto, John F. Dovidio, Sarit A. Golub, Andrei Cimpian, Melis Muradoglu and George E. Newman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Journal of Applied Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Andrea C. Vial

18 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrea C. Vial United States 12 289 227 99 92 67 19 503
Daphne E. Pedersen United States 16 163 0.6× 333 1.5× 193 1.9× 57 0.6× 25 0.4× 48 665
Voon Chin Phua United States 12 171 0.6× 313 1.4× 123 1.2× 22 0.2× 19 0.3× 37 525
Jean Turner United States 3 168 0.6× 183 0.8× 256 2.6× 222 2.4× 27 0.4× 4 535
Brad Sears United States 11 266 0.9× 271 1.2× 399 4.0× 19 0.2× 47 0.7× 62 630
Mark Finn United Kingdom 12 77 0.3× 179 0.8× 114 1.2× 14 0.2× 32 0.5× 35 421
Terry Cluse-Tolar United States 10 95 0.3× 309 1.4× 142 1.4× 135 1.5× 10 0.1× 14 523
Nancy Lough United States 16 309 1.1× 300 1.3× 94 0.9× 40 0.4× 59 0.9× 52 599
Jessica C. M. Li Hong Kong 12 92 0.3× 367 1.6× 134 1.4× 67 0.7× 6 0.1× 44 598
Petra Brock United States 7 48 0.2× 79 0.3× 80 0.8× 43 0.5× 69 1.0× 17 292

Countries citing papers authored by Andrea C. Vial

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrea C. Vial's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrea C. Vial with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrea C. Vial more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrea C. Vial

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrea C. Vial. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrea C. Vial. The network helps show where Andrea C. Vial may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrea C. Vial

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrea C. Vial. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrea C. Vial based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrea C. Vial. Andrea C. Vial is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
2.
Vial, Andrea C., et al.. (2025). Syntactic and Semantic Gender Biases in the Language on Children’s Television: Evidence From a Corpus of 98 Shows From 1960 to 2018. Psychological Science. 36(7). 574–588. 1 indexed citations
3.
Vial, Andrea C., April H. Bailey, & John F. Dovidio. (2024). People Who Accommodate Others’ Sexist Views Are Themselves Perceived to Be Sexist. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 48(2). 252–270. 2 indexed citations
4.
Vial, Andrea C. & Andrei Cimpian. (2023). Gender Differences in Children’s Reasoning About and Motivation to Pursue Leadership Roles. Sex Roles. 90(1). 42–65. 5 indexed citations
5.
Napier, Jaime L., Jojanneke van der Toorn, & Andrea C. Vial. (2023). The Personal is Political: Internalized Sexual Stigma and the Desire for Gender Complementarity in (some) Same-Gender Relationships. Sex Roles. 89(3-4). 97–118. 5 indexed citations
6.
Vial, Andrea C., et al.. (2022). Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 849566–849566. 14 indexed citations
7.
Vial, Andrea C., Melis Muradoglu, George E. Newman, & Andrei Cimpian. (2022). An Emphasis on Brilliance Fosters Masculinity-Contest Cultures. Psychological Science. 33(4). 595–612. 35 indexed citations
8.
Vial, Andrea C., Janine Bosak, Patrick C. Flood, & John F. Dovidio. (2021). Individual variation in role construal predicts responses to third-party biases in hiring contexts. PLoS ONE. 16(2). e0244393–e0244393. 2 indexed citations
9.
Kahalon, Rotem, et al.. (2019). The Madonna-Whore Dichotomy Is Associated With Patriarchy Endorsement: Evidence From Israel, the United States, and Germany. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 43(3). 348–367. 25 indexed citations
10.
Vial, Andrea C., John F. Dovidio, & Victoria L. Brescoll. (2019). Channeling others' biases to meet role demands. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 82. 47–63. 4 indexed citations
11.
Vial, Andrea C. & Jaime L. Napier. (2018). Unnecessary Frills: Communality as a Nice (But Expendable) Trait in Leaders. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1866–1866. 36 indexed citations
12.
Vial, Andrea C., Victoria L. Brescoll, & John F. Dovidio. (2018). Third-party prejudice accommodation increases gender discrimination.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 117(1). 73–98. 20 indexed citations
13.
Brescoll, Victoria L., Tyler G. Okimoto, & Andrea C. Vial. (2018). You've Come a Long Way…Maybe: How Moral Emotions Trigger Backlash Against Women Leaders. Journal of Social Issues. 74(1). 144–164. 63 indexed citations
14.
Vial, Andrea C., Victoria L. Brescoll, Jaime L. Napier, John F. Dovidio, & Tom R. Tyler. (2017). Differential support for female supervisors among men and women.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 103(2). 215–227. 29 indexed citations
15.
Vial, Andrea C. & Jaime L. Napier. (2016). High power mindsets reduce gender identification and benevolent sexism among women (But not men). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 68. 162–170. 12 indexed citations
16.
Vial, Andrea C., Jaime L. Napier, & Victoria L. Brescoll. (2016). A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy. The Leadership Quarterly. 27(3). 400–414. 147 indexed citations
17.
Vial, Andrea C., Tyrel J. Starks, & Jeffrey T. Parsons. (2015). Relative Efficiency of Field and Online Strategies in the Recruitment of HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex With Men. AIDS Education and Prevention. 27(2). 103–111. 15 indexed citations
18.
Vial, Andrea C., Tyrel J. Starks, & Jeffrey T. Parsons. (2014). Finding and Recruiting the Highest Risk HIV-Negative Men Who Have Sex With Men. AIDS Education and Prevention. 26(1). 56–67. 38 indexed citations
19.
Parsons, Jeffrey T., Andrea C. Vial, Tyrel J. Starks, & Sarit A. Golub. (2012). Recruiting Drug Using Men Who Have Sex with Men in Behavioral Intervention Trials: A Comparison of Internet and Field-Based Strategies. AIDS and Behavior. 17(2). 688–699. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026