Amy‐May Leach

579 total citations
22 papers, 319 citations indexed

About

Amy‐May Leach is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy‐May Leach has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 319 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Social Psychology, 11 papers in Clinical Psychology and 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Amy‐May Leach's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (22 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (11 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers). Amy‐May Leach is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (22 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (11 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers). Amy‐May Leach collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Amy‐May Leach's co-authors include Kimberley A. Clow, R. C. L. Lindsay, Nicholas Bala, Victoria Talwar, Kang Lee, Jennifer L Beaudry, Krystle Martin, Brian L. Cutler, Andrew M. Smith and Lucy Akehurst and has published in prestigious journals such as Perspectives on Psychological Science, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Law and Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Amy‐May Leach

21 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amy‐May Leach Canada 11 228 131 123 112 39 22 319
Jonathan P. Vallano United States 9 313 1.4× 193 1.5× 95 0.8× 121 1.1× 27 0.7× 20 407
Stamatis Elntib United Kingdom 8 239 1.0× 101 0.8× 111 0.9× 159 1.4× 22 0.6× 17 330
Kathryn Sperry United States 6 259 1.1× 139 1.1× 143 1.2× 127 1.1× 57 1.5× 9 332
Zarah Vernham United Kingdom 12 358 1.6× 174 1.3× 269 2.2× 240 2.1× 104 2.7× 37 482
Joyce E. Humphries United Kingdom 9 156 0.7× 220 1.7× 45 0.4× 57 0.5× 15 0.4× 16 316
Stephen W. Michael United States 8 354 1.6× 144 1.1× 191 1.6× 153 1.4× 75 1.9× 11 399
Mairi Benson Australia 9 83 0.4× 67 0.5× 157 1.3× 84 0.8× 18 0.5× 12 297
Rod C. L. Lindsay Canada 10 257 1.1× 301 2.3× 61 0.5× 43 0.4× 24 0.6× 19 406
Glynis Bogaard Netherlands 11 299 1.3× 118 0.9× 163 1.3× 137 1.2× 99 2.5× 27 339
Emma Roos af Hjelmsäter Sweden 13 283 1.2× 253 1.9× 135 1.1× 96 0.9× 33 0.8× 22 377

Countries citing papers authored by Amy‐May Leach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy‐May Leach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy‐May Leach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy‐May Leach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy‐May Leach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy‐May Leach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy‐May Leach. The network helps show where Amy‐May Leach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy‐May Leach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy‐May Leach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy‐May Leach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy‐May Leach. Amy‐May Leach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Leach, Amy‐May, et al.. (2023). Do Accents Speak Louder Than Words? Perceptions of Linguistic Speech Characteristics on Deception Detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 43(2). 195–223. 2 indexed citations
2.
Cutler, Brian L., et al.. (2022). Development of the Interview and Interrogation Assessment Instrument.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 29(1). 46–61. 1 indexed citations
3.
Leach, Amy‐May, et al.. (2022). False impressions? The effect of language proficiency on cues, perceptions, and lie detection.. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 56(1). 31–40. 2 indexed citations
4.
Leach, Amy‐May, et al.. (2021). COVID-19 and the courtroom: how social and cognitive psychological processes might affect trials during a pandemic. Psychology Crime and Law. 28(8). 731–762.
5.
Cutler, Brian L., et al.. (2019). Perceptions of coercion in interrogation: comparing expert and lay opinions. Psychology Crime and Law. 26(4). 384–401. 8 indexed citations
6.
Leach, Amy‐May, et al.. (2019). Looks like a liar? Beliefs about native and non‐native speakers' deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34(2). 387–396. 3 indexed citations
7.
Akehurst, Lucy, et al.. (2018). Investigating deception in second language speakers: Interviewee and assessor perspectives. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 23(2). 230–251. 13 indexed citations
8.
Leach, Amy‐May, et al.. (2017). Observers' Language Proficiencies and the Detection of Non‐native Speakers' Deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 31(2). 247–257. 9 indexed citations
9.
Leach, Amy‐May, et al.. (2016). You must be lying because I don’t understand you: Language proficiency and lie detection.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 22(4). 488–499. 21 indexed citations
10.
Lawrence, Hannah R., Lucy Akehurst, Amy‐May Leach, et al.. (2016). ‘Look This Way’: Using Gaze Maintenance to Facilitate the Detection of Children's False Reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 31(1). 69–80. 3 indexed citations
11.
Clow, Kimberley A. & Amy‐May Leach. (2014). Stigma and wrongful conviction: all exonerees are not perceived equal. Psychology Crime and Law. 21(2). 172–185. 29 indexed citations
12.
Beaudry, Jennifer L, et al.. (2013). The effect of evidence type, identification accuracy, line‐up presentation, and line‐up administration on observers' perceptions of eyewitnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 20(2). 343–364. 13 indexed citations
13.
Clow, Kimberley A. & Amy‐May Leach. (2013). After innocence: Perceptions of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 20(1). 147–164. 37 indexed citations
14.
Martin, Krystle & Amy‐May Leach. (2012). Psychopathy and deception detection. Personality and Mental Health. 7(2). 154–159. 17 indexed citations
15.
Leach, Amy‐May, et al.. (2012). Language Proficiency and Police Officers’ Lie Detection Performance. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 28(1). 48–53. 14 indexed citations
16.
Leach, Amy‐May, et al.. (2011). Detecting deception in second‐language speakers. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 18(1). 115–127. 31 indexed citations
17.
Lindsay, R. C. L., et al.. (2009). Sequential lineup presentation: Patterns and policy. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 14(1). 13–24. 28 indexed citations
18.
Leach, Amy‐May, et al.. (2009). Lineups and Eyewitness Identification. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 5(1). 157–178. 12 indexed citations
19.
Lindsay, R. C. L., et al.. (2009). Beyond sequential presentation: Misconceptions and misrepresentations of sequential lineups. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 14(1). 31–34. 6 indexed citations
20.
Leach, Amy‐May, Victoria Talwar, Kang Lee, Nicholas Bala, & R. C. L. Lindsay. (2004). "Intuitive" Lie Detection of Children's Deception by Law Enforcement Officials and University Students.. Law and Human Behavior. 28(6). 661–685. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026