Kathryn Sperry

476 total citations
9 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Kathryn Sperry is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathryn Sperry has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Kathryn Sperry's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (4 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (3 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers). Kathryn Sperry is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (4 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (3 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers). Kathryn Sperry collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Kathryn Sperry's co-authors include Kathy Pezdek, Jackie Hillman, Pär Anders Granhag, Sharon Leal, Ronald P. Fisher, Aldert Vrij, Samantha Mann, Jason T. Siegel, Daniel Leví and Richard A. Leo and has published in prestigious journals such as Sex Roles, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Applied Cognitive Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Kathryn Sperry

8 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kathryn Sperry United States 6 259 143 139 127 57 9 332
Glynis Bogaard Netherlands 11 299 1.2× 163 1.1× 118 0.8× 137 1.1× 99 1.7× 27 339
Stephen W. Michael United States 8 354 1.4× 191 1.3× 144 1.0× 153 1.2× 75 1.3× 11 399
Amy‐May Leach Canada 11 228 0.9× 123 0.9× 131 0.9× 112 0.9× 39 0.7× 22 319
Kate A. Houston United States 13 308 1.2× 143 1.0× 192 1.4× 115 0.9× 48 0.8× 17 375
Fadia M. Narchet United States 6 350 1.4× 201 1.4× 162 1.2× 146 1.1× 40 0.7× 8 399
Renate Volbert Germany 11 231 0.9× 202 1.4× 95 0.7× 129 1.0× 59 1.0× 45 347
Louise Jupe United Kingdom 9 204 0.8× 108 0.8× 83 0.6× 96 0.8× 80 1.4× 16 240
Fred E. Inbau 9 361 1.4× 190 1.3× 150 1.1× 165 1.3× 76 1.3× 29 495
Kevin Colwell United States 11 378 1.5× 271 1.9× 185 1.3× 139 1.1× 139 2.4× 24 454
Liza Zvi Israel 12 100 0.4× 129 0.9× 40 0.3× 107 0.8× 29 0.5× 29 261

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn Sperry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn Sperry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn Sperry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn Sperry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn Sperry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn Sperry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn Sperry. The network helps show where Kathryn Sperry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn Sperry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn Sperry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn Sperry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn Sperry. Kathryn Sperry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Sperry, Kathryn, et al.. (2023). The Art of Seduction: Male Endorsement of Coercive and Willful Sex Tactics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 38(17-18). 9641–9670.
2.
Sperry, Kathryn, et al.. (2020). A Religious Paradox: Can Priming Ideas of God Reduce Rape Victim Blame?. Sex Roles. 84(3-4). 196–207. 5 indexed citations
3.
Sperry, Kathryn & Jason T. Siegel. (2011). Victim responsibility, credibility, and verdict in a simulated rape case: Application of Weiner's attribution model. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 18(1). 16–29. 22 indexed citations
4.
Blandón‐Gitlin, Iris, Kathryn Sperry, & Richard A. Leo. (2010). Jurors believe interrogation tactics are not likely to elicit false confessions: will expert witness testimony inform them otherwise?. Psychology Crime and Law. 17(3). 239–260. 4 indexed citations
5.
Pezdek, Kathy, et al.. (2009). Does Trial presentation medium matter in jury simulation research? Evaluating the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 24(5). 673–690. 51 indexed citations
6.
Vrij, Aldert, Sharon Leal, Pär Anders Granhag, et al.. (2008). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions.. Law and Human Behavior. 33(2). 159–166. 186 indexed citations
7.
Pezdek, Kathy, et al.. (2008). Forced confabulation more strongly influences event memory if suggestions are other‐generated than self‐generated. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 14(2). 241–252. 25 indexed citations
8.
Pezdek, Kathy, et al.. (2007). Interviewing witnesses: The effect of forced confabulation on event memory.. Law and Human Behavior. 31(5). 463–478. 37 indexed citations
9.
Leví, Daniel & Kathryn Sperry. (2007). Agriculture at the Urban Interface: Attitudes of New Rural Residents. DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University). 4(1). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026