Julie Cherryman

1.1k total citations
25 papers, 639 citations indexed

About

Julie Cherryman is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie Cherryman has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 639 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Social Psychology, 9 papers in Clinical Psychology and 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Julie Cherryman's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (14 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers). Julie Cherryman is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (14 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers). Julie Cherryman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Canada. Julie Cherryman's co-authors include Aldert Vrij, Karl Nunkoosing, Sarah Knight, Ray Bull, Gavin Oxburgh, James Ost, Mark Turner, Stavroula Soukara, Rebecca Milne and Andy Griffiths and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Cognitive Psychology, The Journal of Psychology and Anthrozoös.

In The Last Decade

Julie Cherryman

23 papers receiving 592 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julie Cherryman United Kingdom 12 390 198 163 155 127 25 639
Sarah Knight United Kingdom 14 443 1.1× 198 1.0× 494 3.0× 123 0.8× 204 1.6× 34 1.0k
Boyka Bratanova United Kingdom 13 202 0.5× 131 0.7× 70 0.4× 51 0.3× 221 1.7× 17 656
Karl Nunkoosing United Kingdom 11 196 0.5× 91 0.5× 162 1.0× 115 0.7× 160 1.3× 23 657
Robert B. Pittman United States 11 220 0.6× 82 0.4× 191 1.2× 34 0.2× 116 0.9× 35 781
Andrew Fowler United Kingdom 16 290 0.7× 106 0.5× 77 0.5× 62 0.4× 145 1.1× 47 697
Suzanne E. Tallichet United States 19 74 0.2× 210 1.1× 370 2.3× 106 0.7× 190 1.5× 24 695
Myrdene Anderson United States 9 112 0.3× 57 0.3× 215 1.3× 23 0.1× 120 0.9× 30 683
Michael Tamborski United States 6 304 0.8× 58 0.3× 133 0.8× 272 1.8× 182 1.4× 6 700
Emma Alleyne United Kingdom 15 117 0.3× 65 0.3× 92 0.6× 308 2.0× 414 3.3× 37 715
Eleanor Moodie United Kingdom 11 124 0.3× 36 0.2× 32 0.2× 160 1.0× 90 0.7× 15 510

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Cherryman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Cherryman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Cherryman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Cherryman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Cherryman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Cherryman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Cherryman. The network helps show where Julie Cherryman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Cherryman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Cherryman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Cherryman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Cherryman. Julie Cherryman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Milne, Rebecca, et al.. (2024). Managing investigative interviews with vulnerable suspects in the UK: do specialist interview managers (IM’s) understand vulnerability?. Psychology Crime and Law. 31(10). 1214–1233. 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
Akehurst, Lucy, et al.. (2020). Police Interviewers’ Perceptions of Child Credibility in Forensic Investigations. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 27(1). 61–80. 8 indexed citations
4.
Blades, Mark, et al.. (2020). The impact of investing in the good interviewers policy of practice (IGIpop) on police interviews with children. Police Practice and Research. 22(1). 1046–1057. 3 indexed citations
5.
Cherryman, Julie, et al.. (2019). Mock juror's perceptions of a child witness passing or failing a truth and lies discussion or promising to tell the truth. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34(1). 285–292. 2 indexed citations
6.
Gabbert, Fiona, et al.. (2016). Police officers' perceptions and experiences with mentally disordered suspects. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 49(Pt A). 138–146. 14 indexed citations
7.
Lawrence, Hannah R., Lucy Akehurst, Amy‐May Leach, et al.. (2016). ‘Look This Way’: Using Gaze Maintenance to Facilitate the Detection of Children's False Reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 31(1). 69–80. 3 indexed citations
8.
Blades, Mark, et al.. (2015). A Qualitative Examination of “Ground Rules” Implementation Practice in Investigative Interviews with Children. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 22(6). 830–841. 1 indexed citations
9.
Oxburgh, Gavin, James Ost, Paul Morris, & Julie Cherryman. (2014). The Impact of Question Type and Empathy on Police Interviews with Suspects of Homicide, Filicide and Child Sexual Abuse. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 21(6). 903–917. 18 indexed citations
10.
Oxburgh, Gavin, James Ost, Paul Morris, & Julie Cherryman. (2013). Police officers’ perceptions of interviews in cases of sexual offences and murder involving children and adult victims. Police Practice and Research. 16(1). 36–50. 19 indexed citations
11.
Cherryman, Julie, et al.. (2013). The Impact of Laughter in Earwitness Identification Performance. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 20(6). 887–898. 6 indexed citations
12.
Griffiths, Andy, Rebecca Milne, & Julie Cherryman. (2011). A Question of Control? The Formulation of Suspect and Witness Interview Question Strategies by Advanced Interviewers. International Journal of Police Science & Management. 13(3). 255–267. 38 indexed citations
13.
Oxburgh, Gavin, James Ost, & Julie Cherryman. (2010). Police interviews with suspected child sex offenders: does use of empathy and question type influence the amount of investigation relevant information obtained?. Psychology Crime and Law. 18(3). 259–273. 53 indexed citations
14.
Soukara, Stavroula, Ray Bull, Aldert Vrij, Mark Turner, & Julie Cherryman. (2009). What really happens in police interviews of suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology Crime and Law. 15(6). 493–506. 103 indexed citations
15.
Knight, Sarah, Aldert Vrij, Julie Cherryman, & Karl Nunkoosing. (2004). Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind. Anthrozoös. 17(1). 43–62. 193 indexed citations
16.
Vrij, Aldert, Karl Nunkoosing, Sarah Knight, & Julie Cherryman. (2003). Using Grounded Theory to Examine People's Attitudes Toward How Animals are Used. Society and Animals. 11(4). 307–327. 79 indexed citations
17.
Cherryman, Julie & Ray Bull. (2001). Police Officers' Perceptions of Specialist Investigative Interviewing Skills. International Journal of Police Science & Management. 3(3). 199–212. 22 indexed citations
18.
Cherryman, Julie & Ray Bull. (2000). Reflections on investigative interviewing. 194–210. 3 indexed citations
19.
Cherryman, Julie, Nigel King, & Ray Bull. (2000). Child Witness Investigative Interviews: An Analysis of the Use of Children's Video-Recorded Evidence in North Yorkshire. International Journal of Police Science & Management. 2(1). 50–56. 4 indexed citations
20.
Vrij, Aldert, et al.. (1996). Reducing Ethnic Prejudice Through Public Communication Programs: A Social-Psychological Perspective. The Journal of Psychology. 130(4). 413–420. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah Knight Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Boyka Bratanova Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karl Nunkoosing Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert B. Pittman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew Fowler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Suzanne E. Tallichet Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Myrdene Anderson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Tamborski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emma Alleyne Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eleanor Moodie
Rankless by CCL
2026