Stamatis Elntib

525 total citations
17 papers, 330 citations indexed

About

Stamatis Elntib is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stamatis Elntib has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 330 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Social Psychology, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stamatis Elntib's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (7 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (5 papers) and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (3 papers). Stamatis Elntib is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (7 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (5 papers) and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (3 papers). Stamatis Elntib collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Stamatis Elntib's co-authors include Emily Alison, Laurence Alison, Paul Christiansen, Sara Waring, Graham F. Wagstaff, Jacqueline M. Wheatcroft, Vincent Egan, Jon C. Cole, Ben Cole and Μαρία Ιωάννου and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Stamatis Elntib

15 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stamatis Elntib United Kingdom 8 239 159 111 101 78 17 330
Kimberly D. Richman United States 6 244 1.0× 123 0.8× 136 1.2× 99 1.0× 62 0.8× 10 316
Fadia M. Narchet United States 6 350 1.5× 146 0.9× 201 1.8× 162 1.6× 45 0.6× 8 399
Hayley M. D. Cleary United States 11 154 0.6× 151 0.9× 149 1.3× 45 0.4× 82 1.1× 25 313
Stephen W. Michael United States 8 354 1.5× 153 1.0× 191 1.7× 144 1.4× 46 0.6× 11 399
Colin Clarke United Kingdom 7 185 0.8× 79 0.5× 89 0.8× 85 0.8× 77 1.0× 12 283
Steven A. Drizin United States 8 630 2.6× 282 1.8× 426 3.8× 243 2.4× 109 1.4× 18 739
Kathryn Sperry United States 6 259 1.1× 127 0.8× 143 1.3× 139 1.4× 11 0.1× 9 332
John Synnott United Kingdom 10 144 0.6× 161 1.0× 153 1.4× 36 0.4× 19 0.2× 36 328
Natalie Martschuk Australia 10 104 0.4× 57 0.4× 69 0.6× 62 0.6× 16 0.2× 41 260
Barrie Irving United Kingdom 8 82 0.3× 86 0.5× 117 1.1× 35 0.3× 46 0.6× 15 248

Countries citing papers authored by Stamatis Elntib

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stamatis Elntib's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stamatis Elntib with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stamatis Elntib more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stamatis Elntib

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stamatis Elntib. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stamatis Elntib. The network helps show where Stamatis Elntib may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stamatis Elntib

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stamatis Elntib. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stamatis Elntib based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stamatis Elntib. Stamatis Elntib is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Elntib, Stamatis. (2024). Instructor Maladaptive and Adaptive Relational Styles (I-MARS) as drivers of online-student retention and satisfaction. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8. 100238–100238.
2.
Elntib, Stamatis, et al.. (2022). Availability of Social Support, Coping Strategies, Student Stressors and Wellness Among Older Women Studying Online During the Pandemic. Higher Learning Research Communications. 12(2). 1 indexed citations
3.
Elntib, Stamatis, et al.. (2021). Strongly masked content retained in memory made accessible through repetition. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 10284–10284. 2 indexed citations
4.
Elntib, Stamatis, et al.. (2021). Community cohesion during the first peak of the COVID‐19 pandemic: A social antidote to health anxiety and stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 51(8). 793–808. 24 indexed citations
5.
Foster, Helen & Stamatis Elntib. (2020). Stress and well‐being of unpaid carers supporting claimants through disability benefit assessments. Health & Social Care in the Community. 28(5). 1525–1534. 2 indexed citations
6.
Elntib, Stamatis, et al.. (2020). Motivations for Becoming a Police Officer: a Global Snapshot. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 36(2). 211–219. 13 indexed citations
7.
Elntib, Stamatis, et al.. (2019). Temperature fluctuations at sympathetic preganglionic neuron sites in the thoracolumbar section of the spinal column as cues to deception: a preliminary study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 30(4). 706–725. 1 indexed citations
8.
Elntib, Stamatis, et al.. (2018). When sex is more than just sex: evaluating police perspectives regarding the challenges in interviewing victims of sexual offences in Jamaica. Policing & Society. 30(3). 255–275. 1 indexed citations
9.
Elntib, Stamatis & Graham F. Wagstaff. (2017). Are reality monitoring differences between truthful and deceptive autobiographical accounts affected by standardisation for word-count and the presence of others?. Psychology Crime and Law. 23(7). 699–716. 7 indexed citations
10.
Elntib, Stamatis, et al.. (2017). Is the Public Willing to Help the Nigerian Police During the Boko Haram Crisis? A Look at Moderating Factors. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 33(1). 55–62. 5 indexed citations
11.
Egan, Vincent, Jon C. Cole, Ben Cole, et al.. (2016). Can you identify violent extremists using a screening checklist and open-source intelligence alone?. Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham). 3(1). 21–36. 21 indexed citations
12.
Alison, Laurence, et al.. (2014). The efficacy of rapport-based techniques for minimizing counter-interrogation tactics amongst a field sample of terrorists.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 20(4). 421–430. 61 indexed citations
13.
Elntib, Stamatis, Graham F. Wagstaff, & Jacqueline M. Wheatcroft. (2014). The Role of Account Length in Detecting Deception in Written and Orally Produced Autobiographical Accounts using Reality Monitoring. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 12(2). 185–198. 14 indexed citations
14.
Elntib, Stamatis, et al.. (2014). Critical incidents’ impact on front-line South African police personnel in light of the current briefing and debriefing strategies. South African Journal of Psychology. 44(4). 416–425. 5 indexed citations
15.
Alison, Laurence, et al.. (2014). Whatever you say, say nothing: Individual differences in counter interrogation tactics amongst a field sample of right wing, AQ inspired and paramilitary terrorists. Personality and Individual Differences. 68. 170–175. 36 indexed citations
16.
Alison, Laurence, et al.. (2013). Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing Rapport-Based Interpersonal Techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 19(4). 411–431. 137 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026