Stamatis Elntib

525 total citations
17 papers, 330 citations indexed

About

Stamatis Elntib is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stamatis Elntib has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 330 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Social Psychology, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stamatis Elntib's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (7 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (5 papers) and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (3 papers). Stamatis Elntib is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (7 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (5 papers) and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (3 papers). Stamatis Elntib collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Stamatis Elntib's co-authors include Emily Alison, Laurence Alison, Paul Christiansen, Sara Waring, Graham F. Wagstaff, Jacqueline M. Wheatcroft, Vincent Egan, Jon C. Cole, Ben Cole and Μαρία Ιωάννου and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Stamatis Elntib

15 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Stamatis Elntib
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Social Psychology 239
  • Sociology and Political Science 159
  • Clinical Psychology 111
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 101
  • Political Science and International Relations 78
Kimberly D. Richman United States
Fadia M. Narchet United States
Hayley M. D. Cleary United States
Stephen W. Michael United States
Colin Clarke United Kingdom
Steven A. Drizin United States
Kathryn Sperry United States
John Synnott United Kingdom
Natalie Martschuk Australia
Barrie Irving United Kingdom
Kimberly D. Richman United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Stamatis Elntib
Stamatis Elntib · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Stamatis Elntib
Stamatis Elntib · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Stamatis Elntib

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stamatis Elntib's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stamatis Elntib with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stamatis Elntib more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stamatis Elntib

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stamatis Elntib. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stamatis Elntib. The network helps show where Stamatis Elntib may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stamatis Elntib

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stamatis Elntib. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stamatis Elntib based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stamatis Elntib. Stamatis Elntib is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 2
4 24
5 2
6 13
7 1
8 1
9 7
10 5
11 21
12 61
13 14
14 5
15 36
16 137
17 0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026