Stephen W. Michael

720 total citations
11 papers, 399 citations indexed

About

Stephen W. Michael is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen W. Michael has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 399 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Social Psychology, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Stephen W. Michael's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (4 papers). Stephen W. Michael is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (4 papers). Stephen W. Michael collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Stephen W. Michael's co-authors include Christian A. Meissner, Jacqueline R. Evans, Susan Brandon, Siegfried L. Sporer, Allison D. Redlich, Marianna Carlucci, Kyle C Scherr, Jonathan P. Vallano, Melissa B. Russano and Eric Stocks and has published in prestigious journals such as Communication Research, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Criminal Justice and Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Stephen W. Michael

11 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen W. Michael United States 8 354 191 153 144 75 11 399
Steven M. Kleinman United States 13 383 1.1× 175 0.9× 244 1.6× 161 1.1× 42 0.6× 23 476
Fadia M. Narchet United States 6 350 1.0× 201 1.1× 146 1.0× 162 1.1× 40 0.5× 8 399
Amy‐May Leach Canada 11 228 0.6× 123 0.6× 112 0.7× 131 0.9× 39 0.5× 22 319
Kathryn Sperry United States 6 259 0.7× 143 0.7× 127 0.8× 139 1.0× 57 0.8× 9 332
Zarah Vernham United Kingdom 12 358 1.0× 269 1.4× 240 1.6× 174 1.2× 104 1.4× 37 482
Stamatis Elntib United Kingdom 8 239 0.7× 111 0.6× 159 1.0× 101 0.7× 22 0.3× 17 330
Kevin Colwell United States 11 378 1.1× 271 1.4× 139 0.9× 185 1.3× 139 1.9× 24 454
Glynis Bogaard Netherlands 11 299 0.8× 163 0.9× 137 0.9× 118 0.8× 99 1.3× 27 339
Fred E. Inbau 9 361 1.0× 190 1.0× 165 1.1× 150 1.0× 76 1.0× 29 495
Ellen Wessel Norway 9 222 0.6× 117 0.6× 115 0.8× 84 0.6× 26 0.3× 10 344

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen W. Michael

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen W. Michael's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen W. Michael with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen W. Michael more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen W. Michael

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen W. Michael. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen W. Michael. The network helps show where Stephen W. Michael may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen W. Michael

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen W. Michael. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen W. Michael based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen W. Michael. Stephen W. Michael is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Susa, Kyle J., et al.. (2020). When seconds matter: The influence of testing with microdelayed feedback.. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 7(2). 140–148. 1 indexed citations
2.
Evans, Jacqueline R., J. Zoe Klemfuss, Jonathan P. Vallano, et al.. (2019). Juror Perceptions of Intoxicated Suspects’ Interrogation-Related Behaviors. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 47(2). 222–246. 8 indexed citations
3.
Susa, Kyle J., et al.. (2018). Imposter identification in low prevalence environments. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 24(1). 179–193. 6 indexed citations
4.
Evans, Jacqueline R., J. Zoe Klemfuss, Kyle C Scherr, et al.. (2018). A survey of potential jurors’ perceptions of interrogations and confessions.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 24(4). 430–448. 20 indexed citations
5.
Evans, Jacqueline R., et al.. (2017). The ability to detect false statements as a function of the type of statement and the language proficiency of the statement provider.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 23(3). 290–300. 14 indexed citations
6.
Sporer, Siegfried L., et al.. (2014). Does Training Improve the Detection of Deception? A Meta-Analysis. Communication Research. 43(3). 283–343. 104 indexed citations
7.
Meissner, Christian A., et al.. (2014). Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 10(4). 459–486. 137 indexed citations
8.
Evans, Jacqueline R. & Stephen W. Michael. (2013). Detecting Deception in Non‐Native English Speakers. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 28(2). 226–237. 28 indexed citations
9.
Evans, Jacqueline R., Stephen W. Michael, Christian A. Meissner, & Susan Brandon. (2013). Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a Psychologically Based Credibility Assessment Tool.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2(1). 33–41. 62 indexed citations
10.
Michael, Stephen W., et al.. (2012). Alibi Believability: The Impact of Salacious Alibi Activities. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal. 40(4). 605–612. 15 indexed citations
11.
Michael, Stephen W., et al.. (2011). Brief Report: Narrative Qualities and Perceptions of Generated Alibis. North American journal of psychology. 13(3). 359. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026