Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A systematic review of climate change education: giving children and young people a ‘voice’ and a ‘hand’ in redressing climate change
Countries citing papers authored by Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie. The network helps show where Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie. Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cutter‐Mackenzie, Amy, Karen Malone, & Elisabeth Barratt Hacking. (2020). Research handbook on childhoodnature : assemblages of childhood and nature research. Springer eBooks.56 indexed citations
7.
Edward, Sheila, Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie, Deborah Moore, & Wendy Boyd. (2017). Finding the balance: A play-framework for play-based learning and intentional teaching in early childhood education. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 23(1). 14–15.5 indexed citations
Elliott, Sue, Susan Edwards, Julie M. Davis, & Amy Cutter‐Mackenzie. (2013). Early Childhood Australia's best of sustainability: research, practice and theory. RUNE (Research UNE).7 indexed citations
13.
Edwards, Susan, et al.. (2012). 'It will be a wasteland if we don't recycle' - sustainability and intentional teaching in early childhood. 18(3). 12.3 indexed citations
Cutter‐Mackenzie, Amy, et al.. (2009). Video-based research methodologies: possibilities and challenges for early childhood education research. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University).1 indexed citations
Cutter‐Mackenzie, Amy, et al.. (2009). Investigating the environmental scientific concepts in children's play: How do children and teachers interpret play-based learning?. Research Bank (Australian Catholic University). 16(1). 49–61.4 indexed citations
Cutter‐Mackenzie, Amy & Daniella Tilbury. (2002). Meeting commitments for a sustainable future. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University).3 indexed citations
20.
Cutter‐Mackenzie, Amy, et al.. (2001). A chasm in environmental education : what primary school teachers 'might' or 'might not' know. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.