Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research
2017722 citationsMartha C. Monroe, Richard Plate et al.Environmental Education Researchprofile →
Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review
2019419 citationsNicole M. Ardoin, Alison W. Bowers et al.Biological Conservationprofile →
Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research
2017196 citationsNicole M. Ardoin, Alison W. Bowers et al.The Journal of Environmental Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Alison W. Bowers
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Alison W. Bowers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison W. Bowers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison W. Bowers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alison W. Bowers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison W. Bowers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison W. Bowers. The network helps show where Alison W. Bowers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison W. Bowers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison W. Bowers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison W. Bowers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alison W. Bowers. Alison W. Bowers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ardoin, Nicole M., Alison W. Bowers, & Estelle Gaillard. (2019). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation. 241. 108224–108224.419 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Bowers, Alison W., Shyam Ranganathan, & Denise R. Simmons. (2018). Defining Quality in Undergraduate Education. Higher Learning Research Communications. 8(1).2 indexed citations
14.
Monroe, Martha C., Richard Plate, Annie Oxarart, Alison W. Bowers, & Willandia A. Chaves. (2017). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research. 25(6). 791–812.722 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Ardoin, Nicole M., Alison W. Bowers, Noelle Wyman Roth, & Nicole Holthuis. (2017). Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research. The Journal of Environmental Education. 49(1). 1–17.196 indexed citations breakdown →
Monroe, Martha C., Susan K. Jacobson, & Alison W. Bowers. (2003). Partnerships for Natural Resource Education: Differing Program Needs and Perspectives of Extension Agents and State Agency Staff.. TigerPrints (Clemson University). 41(3).2 indexed citations
19.
Nelson, Kristen C., et al.. (2003). Public perceptions of defensible space and landscape values in Minnesota and Florida.. 55–62.15 indexed citations
20.
Monroe, Martha C., et al.. (2003). The Moving Edge: Perspectives on the Southern Wildland-Urban Interface. 63.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.