Amon Chizema
- Accounting top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Xiaohui LiuJiangyong LuKevin IbehKingsley Opoku AppiahDzidziso Samuel KamuriwoByung S. MinTrevor BuckLan Gao
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (23 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (7 papers)Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaStrategic Management JournalJournal of Business Ethics
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGhanaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Amon Chizema
25 papers receiving 996 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Accounting 686
- Strategy and Management 522
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 212
- Economics and Econometrics 132
- Gender Studies 125
Countries citing papers authored by Amon Chizema
This map shows the geographic impact of Amon Chizema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amon Chizema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amon Chizema more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amon Chizema
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amon Chizema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amon Chizema. The network helps show where Amon Chizema may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amon Chizema
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amon Chizema. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amon Chizema based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amon Chizema. Amon Chizema is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 73 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 55 | |
| 10 | 106 | |
| 11 | 107 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 97 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 65 | |
| 19 | 63 | |
| 20 | 54 |
About Amon Chizema
Amon Chizema is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (23 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (7 papers) and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (686 citations), Strategy and Management (522 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (212 citations). Amon Chizema has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xiaohui Liu, Jiangyong Lu, Kevin Ibeh, Kingsley Opoku Appiah, Dzidziso Samuel Kamuriwo, Byung S. Min, Trevor Buck, Lan Gao, Nathaniel Boso and J. C. Arthur. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Strategic Management Journal and Journal of Business Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.