Alexis Hope

715 total citations
16 papers, 451 citations indexed

About

Alexis Hope is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Alexis Hope has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 451 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 4 papers in Information Systems and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Alexis Hope's work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (4 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (3 papers). Alexis Hope is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (4 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (3 papers). Alexis Hope collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sierra Leone and Uganda. Alexis Hope's co-authors include Catherine D’Ignazio, Ethan Zuckerman, Ted Schwaba, Anne Marie Piper, Beth Kolko, Jennifer Roberts, Waylon Brunette, Ruth Anderson, Rahul Bhargava and Robert Nathan and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Marine Science, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations.

In The Last Decade

Alexis Hope

15 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Alexis Hope

HI

SPS

DEMOG

IS

MTI

Teresa Almeida United Kingdom

Ben Jelen United States

Wendy Roldan United States

Sebastian Linxen Switzerland

Angela D. R. Smith United States

Juan F. Maestre United States

Selina Sutton United Kingdom

Aditya Vishwanath United States

Karen Stendal Norway

Peter Francis United Kingdom

Teresa Almeida United Kingdom

Alexis Hope

403 ×2.1

HI

175 ×1.7

SPS

122 ×1.2

DEMOG

64 ×1.0

IS

26 ×0.5

MTI

Citations per year, relative to Alexis Hope Alexis Hope (= 1×) peers Teresa Almeida

Countries citing papers authored by Alexis Hope

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexis Hope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexis Hope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexis Hope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexis Hope

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexis Hope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexis Hope. The network helps show where Alexis Hope may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexis Hope

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexis Hope. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexis Hope based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexis Hope. Alexis Hope is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Bell, Katherine L.C., et al.. (2023). Exposing inequities in deep-sea exploration and research: results of the 2022 Global Deep-Sea Capacity Assessment. Frontiers in Marine Science. 10. 20 indexed citations

2.

Roberts, Hal, Rahul Bhargava, Momin M. Malik, et al.. (2021). Media Cloud: Massive Open Source Collection of Global News on the Open Web. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 15. 1034–1045. 31 indexed citations

3.

Hope, Alexis, et al.. (2021). Here Be Dragons 2018 Report.

4.

D’Ignazio, Catherine, et al.. (2020). "The Personal is Political". Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 4(CSCW2). 1–23. 18 indexed citations

5.

Hope, Alexis, et al.. (2019). Hackathons as Participatory Design. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 1–14. 67 indexed citations

6.

Bhargava, Rahul, et al.. (2019). Gobo. 151–155. 16 indexed citations

7.

Easterday, Matthew W., et al.. (2017). Political Agenda. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations. 9(3). 41–66. 3 indexed citations

8.

D’Ignazio, Catherine, et al.. (2016). A Feminist HCI Approach to Designing Postpartum Technologies. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 2612–2622. 94 indexed citations

9.

Heibeck, Felix, et al.. (2014). Sensory Fiction. 35–40. 10 indexed citations

10.

Hope, Alexis, Ted Schwaba, & Anne Marie Piper. (2014). Understanding digital and material social communications for older adults. 3903–3912. 89 indexed citations

11.

Hope, Alexis, et al.. (2013). Hero. 637–642. 4 indexed citations

12.

Anderson, Ruth, et al.. (2012). The midwife's assistant. 200–210. 8 indexed citations

13.

Kolko, Beth, et al.. (2012). Adapting collaborative radiological practice to low-resource environments. 97–106. 13 indexed citations

14.

Kolko, Beth, et al.. (2012). Hackademia. 129–138. 36 indexed citations

15.

Brunette, Waylon, et al.. (2011). Reducing Maternal Mortality: An Ultrasound System for Village Midwives. 84–90. 23 indexed citations

16.

Brunette, Waylon, Alexis Hope, Ruth Anderson, et al.. (2010). Portable antenatal ultrasound platform for village midwives. 1–10. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact