Laura Doherty

46 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers

Laura Doherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Microbiology 52
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Physiology 69
  • General Health Professions 48
  • Health 15
Replace Xiaofei Chi with:
Xiaofei Chi United States
Marc Martí Spain
C W Fong Singapore
Avi Zini Israel
D. Merrick United Kingdom
Bethany Myers United States
Jennifer Albright United States
Brenda Heaton United States
Carlos Podalírio Borges de Almeida Brazil
Yong Ma China
Laura Doherty relative to Xiaofei Chi United States Xiaofei Chi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Xiaofei Chi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laura Doherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Doherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Doherty. The network helps show where Laura Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laura Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laura Doherty Line = papers co-authored together Laura Doherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200282
2 199336
3 202314
4 202111
5 202210
6 202110
7 20229
8 20219
9 20209
10 20156
11 20185
12 20085
13 20244
14 20233
15 20223
16 20243
17 20213
18 20103
19 20203
20 20093

About Laura Doherty

Laura Doherty is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Surgery and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (52 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations), Physiology (69 citations), General Health Professions (48 citations) and Health (15 citations). Laura Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Howd, Richard Ames, Samantha Bricknell, David Torgerson, Timothy Lynch, Catherine Hewitt, Caroline Fairhurst, Arabella Scantlebury, Laura Clark and Conor Fearon. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Nursing Standard, BMJ, Contemporary Clinical Trials and Proceedings of The Nutrition Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact