Ágnes Volein

2.3k citations
24 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ágnes Volein

24 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Ágnes Volein
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 979
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 438
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 262
  • Pharmacy 67
  • Social Psychology 223
Replace Sarah Shultz with:
Sarah Shultz United States
Przemysław Tomalski Poland
Evelyne Mercure United Kingdom
Hanife Halit United Kingdom
Jacqueline Liederman United States
Tamami Nakano Japan
Greg D. Reynolds United States
Ross E. Vanderwert United Kingdom
Leslie Tucker United Kingdom
Marianne Barbu‐Roth France
Ágnes Volein relative to Sarah Shultz United States Sarah Shultz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Sarah Shultz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ágnes Volein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ágnes Volein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ágnes Volein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ágnes Volein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ágnes Volein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ágnes Volein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ágnes Volein. The network helps show where Ágnes Volein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ágnes Volein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ágnes Volein Line = papers co-authored together Ágnes Volein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20235
2 202023
3 20204
4 201512
5 201568
6 201573
7 201573
8 201514
9 201029
10 201037
11 2009141
12 2009181
13 2008153
14 200891
15 200746
16 200711
17 2004152
18 2004124
19 200327
20 200028

About Ágnes Volein

Ágnes Volein is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Anatomy, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (9 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (6 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (4 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (979 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (438 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (262 citations), Pharmacy (67 citations) and Social Psychology (223 citations). Ágnes Volein has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Gergely Csibra, Mark H. Johnson, Leslie Tucker, Tony Charman, Mayada Elsabbagh, Patrick Bolton, Simon Baron‐Cohen, Karla Holmboe, Gillian Baird and Hanife Halit. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Infant Behavior and Development, Cortex, Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026