Agnès Viale
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 0.2%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Oncology top 0.2%
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Papers in
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 33
- Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research 8
- Oncology 42
- Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 11
- Co-authors
- Nicholas D. SocciEric G. PamerAsia GobourneAdam B. OlshenJoan MassaguéDilip D. GiriWeiping ShuWilliam L. Gerald
- Journals
- Clinical Cancer Research (11 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (10 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (9 papers)Cancer Research (8 papers)Blood (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Agnès Viale
137 papers receiving 20.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Cancer Research 3.9k
- Oncology 5.4k
- Molecular Biology 12.1k
- Genetics 1.6k
- Gastroenterology 721
Countries citing papers authored by Agnès Viale
This map shows the geographic impact of Agnès Viale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agnès Viale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agnès Viale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Agnès Viale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agnès Viale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agnès Viale. The network helps show where Agnès Viale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Agnès Viale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 83 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 51 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 99 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 59 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 156 | |
| 10 | Genome Sequencing Identifies a Basis for Everolimus Sensitivity Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 480 |
| 11 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 92 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 98 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 154 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 455 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 147 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 189 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 93 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 111 |
About Agnès Viale
Agnès Viale is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Molecular Biology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 139 papers that have together received 20.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (33 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (16 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (14 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (11 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (10 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (10 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (9 papers) and Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (3.9k citations), Oncology (5.4k citations), Molecular Biology (12.1k citations), Genetics (1.6k citations) and Gastroenterology (721 citations). Agnès Viale has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas D. Socci, Eric G. Pamer, Asia Gobourne, Adam B. Olshen, Joan Massagué, Dilip D. Giri, Weiping Shu, William L. Gerald, Paula D. Bos and Peter M. Siegel. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Cancer Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.