Pier Selenica
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Britta WeigeltJorge S. Reis‐FilhoRobert A. SoslowFresia ParejaKathleen A. BurkeRaymond S. LimCharlotte K.Y. NgMichael F. Berger
- Topics
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (32 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (12 papers)Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsJournal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Pier Selenica
71 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Oncology 424
- Cancer Research 393
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 324
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 313
- Molecular Biology 312
Countries citing papers authored by Pier Selenica
This map shows the geographic impact of Pier Selenica's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pier Selenica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pier Selenica more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pier Selenica
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pier Selenica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pier Selenica. The network helps show where Pier Selenica may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pier Selenica
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pier Selenica. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pier Selenica based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pier Selenica. Pier Selenica is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | The Genomic Landscape of PALB2-Associated Breast Cancers | 1 |
About Pier Selenica
Pier Selenica is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (32 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (12 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (313 citations), Reproductive Medicine (288 citations) and Cancer Research (393 citations). Pier Selenica has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Britta Weigelt, Jorge S. Reis‐Filho, Robert A. Soslow, Fresia Pareja, Kathleen A. Burke, Raymond S. Lim, Charlotte K.Y. Ng, Michael F. Berger, Arnaud Da Cruz Paula and Deborah F. DeLair. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.