Abigail Winder

508 citations
20 papers · 351 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Abigail Winder

19 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Abigail Winder
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 62
  • Reproductive Medicine 29
  • Oncology 72
  • Genetics 65
  • Cancer Research 30
Replace Kathryn A. Saraf with:
Kathryn A. Saraf United States
Yuanxi Zhu China
Angela Bowman United Kingdom
Ivana Tichá Czechia
Y. Torii Japan
Laura Hautala Finland
Andrzej Witek Poland
Shigenori Furukawa Japan
Sonja Vogl Austria
Gwan Hee Han South Korea
Abigail Winder relative to Kathryn A. Saraf United States Kathryn A. Saraf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Kathryn A. Saraf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Abigail Winder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Abigail Winder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abigail Winder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abigail Winder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Abigail Winder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abigail Winder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abigail Winder. The network helps show where Abigail Winder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Abigail Winder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Abigail Winder Line = papers co-authored together Abigail Winder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2003142
2 201340
3 201724
4 201223
5 201720
6 201419
7 201717
8 200913
9 201812
10 200610
11 20118
12 20196
13 20214
14 20184
15 20183
16 20123
17 20241
18 20221
19
Feasibility of Fluciclovine PET-CT Imaging of Endometrial, Cervical, and Ovarian Cancers: Preliminary Findings.
20191
20 20240

About Abigail Winder

Abigail Winder is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (9 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (2 papers), PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (1 paper) and Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (62 citations), Reproductive Medicine (29 citations), Oncology (72 citations), Genetics (65 citations) and Cancer Research (30 citations). Abigail Winder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John R. Lurain, Adriana Stoica, Mary Beth Martin, Gerald E. Stoica, Maria Moroni, Thomas Franke, Anton Wellstein, Ronald Reiter, Susette C. Mueller and Kenji Unno. Their work appears in journals such as Brachytherapy, Gynecologic Oncology, Journal of Health Psychology, The Medical Journal of Australia and Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact