William J. Hoskins
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.02%
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.05%
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Daniel L. Clarke‐PearsonWilliam P. McGuireStephen C. RubinMark F. BradyKatherine Y. LookEdward E. PartridgePaul R. KuceraMartin Davidson
- Topics
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (75 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (45 papers)Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (32 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
William J. Hoskins
144 papers receiving 10.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Reproductive Medicine 6.9k
- Surgery 4.6k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 3.6k
- Oncology 2.8k
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by William J. Hoskins
This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Hoskins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Hoskins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Hoskins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Hoskins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Hoskins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Hoskins. The network helps show where William J. Hoskins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William J. Hoskins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William J. Hoskins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William J. Hoskins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William J. Hoskins. William J. Hoskins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54 | |
| 2 | 151 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | Cervical cancer and preinvasive neoplasia | 42 |
| 6 | Intraperitoneal Cisplatin plus Intravenous Cyclophosphamide versus Intravenous Cisplatin plus Intravenous Cyclophosphamide for Stage III Ovarian Cancerbreakdown → | 906 |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 66 | |
| 10 | 106 | |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 108 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Second-line platinum therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin.breakdown → | 647 |
| 16 | 143 | |
| 17 | 76 | |
| 18 | 68 | |
| 19 | 83 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About William J. Hoskins
William J. Hoskins is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Oncology, having authored 148 papers that have together received 10.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (75 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (45 papers) and Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (6.9k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (3.6k citations) and Surgery (4.6k citations). William J. Hoskins has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Daniel L. Clarke‐Pearson, William P. McGuire, Stephen C. Rubin, Mark F. Brady, Katherine Y. Look, Edward E. Partridge, Paul R. Kucera, Martin Davidson, Robert C. Young and Carlos A. Pérez. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.