Amanda N. Fader
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.05%
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.1%
- Surgery top 1%
- Oncology top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Pedro F. EscobarEdward J. TannerRebecca L. StonePeter G. RosePaola A. GehrigAbdulrahman SinnoRobert E. BristowHeidi E. Frasure
- Topics
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (90 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (75 papers)Uterine Myomas and Treatments (56 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCancer
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaJapan
In The Last Decade
Amanda N. Fader
212 papers receiving 7.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 4.2k
- Reproductive Medicine 3.0k
- Surgery 2.3k
- Oncology 1.6k
- Molecular Biology 760
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda N. Fader
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda N. Fader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda N. Fader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda N. Fader more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda N. Fader
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda N. Fader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda N. Fader. The network helps show where Amanda N. Fader may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda N. Fader
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda N. Fader. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda N. Fader based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda N. Fader. Amanda N. Fader is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 58 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 125 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 88 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | Helping endometrial cancer survivors to live longer - and better | 1 |
About Amanda N. Fader
Amanda N. Fader is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Oncology, having authored 222 papers that have together received 7.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (90 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (75 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (56 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (4.2k citations), Reproductive Medicine (3.0k citations) and Oncology (1.6k citations). Amanda N. Fader has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Pedro F. Escobar, Edward J. Tanner, Rebecca L. Stone, Peter G. Rose, Paola A. Gehrig, Abdulrahman Sinno, Robert E. Bristow, Heidi E. Frasure, Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith and Camille C. Gunderson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.