Countries where authors publish in The Public Historian
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Public Historian. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Public Historian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Public Historian more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Public Historian
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Public Historian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Public Historian.
About The Public Historian
The 1.4k papers published in The Public Historian in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations . Papers published in The Public Historian usually cover Space and Planetary Science (44 papers), Museology (113 papers), History (323 papers), Conservation (90 papers) and Anthropology (140 papers) specifically the topics of Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (235 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (156 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (115 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (111 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (104 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (93 papers), American History and Culture (75 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Public Historian are Sarah Schrank, David Glassberg, Michelle Caswell, Nancy Raquel Mirabal, Otis L. Graham, Eric Gable, Hugh Davis Graham, James B. Gardner, Ronald J. Grele and Marjorie Senechal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.