Memory Studies

852 papers and 7.6k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 852 papers published in Memory Studies in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Memory Studies usually cover Social Psychology (529 papers), Sociology and Political Science (448 papers) and History (138 papers) specifically the topics of Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (483 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (74 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Memory Studies are Paul Connerton, Ann Rigney, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Karen M. Douglas, Andrew Hoskins, Robyn Fıvush, Barbie Zelizer, Marita Sturken, José van Dijck and Annette Kühn.

In The Last Decade

Memory Studies

653 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Memory Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Memory Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Memory Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Memory Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Memory Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Memory Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Memory Studies more than expected).

Seven types of forgetting 2007 2026 2013 2019 303
  1. Seven types of forgetting (2007)
  2. On agonistic memory (2015)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026