History and Anthropology

834 papers and 4.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 834 papers published in History and Anthropology in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations. Papers published in History and Anthropology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (368 papers), Anthropology (364 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (217 papers) specifically the topics of Anthropological Studies and Insights (195 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (59 papers) and Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History and Anthropology are Charles W. Stewart, Denis Byrne, Daniel M. Knight, Dimitrios Theodossopoulos, Stef Jansen, Eric Hirsch, Cathrine Brun, Susana Narotzky, H.G.G.M. Driessen and Rebecca Bryant.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in History and Anthropology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History and Anthropology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History and Anthropology.

Countries where authors publish in History and Anthropology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History and Anthropology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History and Anthropology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History and Anthropology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025