Strategy and Leadership

989 papers and 15.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 989 papers published in Strategy and Leadership in the last decades have received a total of 15.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Strategy and Leadership usually cover Strategy and Management (283 papers), Management Information Systems (132 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (106 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (117 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (69 papers) and Big Data and Business Intelligence (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Strategy and Leadership are Venkat Ramaswamy, Henry Chesbrough, Stephen Denning, Saul J. Berman, C. K. Prahalad, Robert S. Kaplan, D. P. Norton, Michael L. Tushman, Brian Leavy and Robert J. Allio.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Strategy and Leadership

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Strategy and Leadership. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Strategy and Leadership.

Countries where authors publish in Strategy and Leadership

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Strategy and Leadership. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Strategy and Leadership with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Strategy and Leadership more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025