Countries where authors publish in Diabetes Spectrum
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diabetes Spectrum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diabetes Spectrum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diabetes Spectrum more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Diabetes Spectrum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diabetes Spectrum.
About Diabetes Spectrum
The 985 papers published in Diabetes Spectrum in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Diabetes Spectrum usually cover Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (713 papers), Pharmacy (88 papers) and Family Practice (25 papers) specifically the topics of Diabetes Management and Research (473 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (333 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (176 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (115 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (113 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (97 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (84 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diabetes Spectrum are Deborah Hinnen, Betsy B. Dokken, Michele Heisler, John R. White, Katie Weinger, Sarah S. Farabi, Laura Shane‐McWhorter, Carla Cox, Laura L. Want and Stephen Aronoff.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.