Applied Research in Quality of Life

1.2k papers and 16.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Applied Research in Quality of Life in the last decades have received a total of 16.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Research in Quality of Life usually cover Social Psychology (593 papers), Sociology and Political Science (380 papers) and Health (317 papers) specifically the topics of Role of Positive Emotions in Well-Being (461 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (273 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Research in Quality of Life are M. Joseph Sirgy, Ed Diener, Daniel T. L. Shek, Stèfan Krüger, Dong‐Jin Lee, E. Scott Huebner, Christian Bjørnskov, Graciela Tonón, Shiri Lavy and Deniz Yücel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Research in Quality of Life

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Research in Quality of Life. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Research in Quality of Life.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Research in Quality of Life

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Research in Quality of Life. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Research in Quality of Life with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Research in Quality of Life more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025