Minerva

1.3k papers and 18.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Minerva in the last decades have received a total of 18.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Minerva usually cover Political Science and International Relations (269 papers), Sociology and Political Science (182 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (113 papers) specifically the topics of Higher Education Governance and Development (132 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (78 papers) and International Science and Diplomacy (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Minerva are Sheila Jasanoff, Michael Polanyi, Henry Etzkowitz, Alvin M. Weinberg, Sang-Hyun Kim, Aldo Geuna, Harriet Zuckerman, Robert Κ. Merton, Peter Scott and Michael Gibbons.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Minerva

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Minerva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Minerva.

Countries where authors publish in Minerva

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Minerva. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Minerva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minerva more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025