Beth R. Crisp

3.6k total citations
146 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Beth R. Crisp is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Administration and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Beth R. Crisp has authored 146 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 61 papers in General Health Professions, 55 papers in Public Administration and 38 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Beth R. Crisp's work include Social Work Education and Practice (55 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (23 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (19 papers). Beth R. Crisp is often cited by papers focused on Social Work Education and Practice (55 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (23 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (19 papers). Beth R. Crisp collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Beth R. Crisp's co-authors include Pam Green Lister, James G. Barber, Joan Orme, Hal Swerissen, Shane Thomas, Alun C. Jackson, Neil Thomason, Ann Taket, Martin Stevens and Jill Manthorpe and has published in prestigious journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Addiction and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Beth R. Crisp

138 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Beth R. Crisp Australia 26 1.1k 665 642 580 485 146 2.5k
Ian Shaw United Kingdom 28 1.2k 1.1× 455 0.7× 890 1.4× 433 0.7× 701 1.4× 156 2.6k
David Royse United States 25 794 0.7× 620 0.9× 515 0.8× 254 0.4× 322 0.7× 87 1.9k
Laura S. Abrams United States 30 1.0k 0.9× 1.3k 1.9× 497 0.8× 493 0.8× 1.5k 3.0× 119 2.9k
Malcolm Payne United Kingdom 26 1.6k 1.4× 668 1.0× 1.5k 2.3× 726 1.3× 913 1.9× 106 3.2k
John S. Wodarski United States 23 654 0.6× 1.2k 1.8× 264 0.4× 248 0.4× 395 0.8× 185 2.2k
Peter Beresford United Kingdom 41 2.9k 2.7× 765 1.2× 955 1.5× 1.5k 2.5× 903 1.9× 164 4.5k
Lorraine Gutiérrez United States 27 1.2k 1.1× 410 0.6× 548 0.9× 434 0.7× 723 1.5× 69 2.3k
Kimberly Bender United States 31 2.0k 1.9× 1.0k 1.5× 175 0.3× 279 0.5× 1.4k 2.9× 134 3.3k
Cynthia A. Lietz United States 23 475 0.4× 917 1.4× 315 0.5× 269 0.5× 620 1.3× 54 2.0k
Aron Shlonsky Australia 29 1.2k 1.1× 1.5k 2.3× 492 0.8× 199 0.3× 653 1.3× 113 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Beth R. Crisp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth R. Crisp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth R. Crisp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth R. Crisp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth R. Crisp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth R. Crisp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth R. Crisp. The network helps show where Beth R. Crisp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth R. Crisp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth R. Crisp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth R. Crisp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beth R. Crisp. Beth R. Crisp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Crisp, Beth R.. (2024). How Do We Decolonise the Social Work Curriculum?. Australian Social Work. 79(1). 59–71. 2 indexed citations
2.
Riley, Ben J., Sharon Lawn, Beth R. Crisp, & Malcolm Battersby. (2023). Much Ado About Nothing? The Role of Land-Based Gambling Venue Employees in Facilitating Problem Gambling Harm Reduction and Help-Seeking. Journal of Gambling Studies. 40(1). 387–408.
3.
Crisp, Beth R.. (2021). Response to Papadopoulos (2022): Social Work After Tehan: Reframing the Scope of Practice. Australian Social Work. 75(4). 527–529.
4.
Riley, Ben J., Peter Harvey, Beth R. Crisp, Malcolm Battersby, & Sharon Lawn. (2018). Gambling-related harm as reported by concerned significant others: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of empirical studies. Journal of Family Studies. 27(1). 112–130. 45 indexed citations
5.
Crisp, Beth R.. (2017). Leadership and Social Work Education in the Online Environment. Advances in Social Work. 19(1). 80–91. 5 indexed citations
6.
Crisp, Beth R. & Liz Beddoe. (2013). Introduction: Promoting health and well-being in social work education. Own your potential (DEAKIN). 31(10). 1–5. 1 indexed citations
7.
Crisp, Beth R. & John G. Fox. (2012). Negotiating the university environment : how first year students learn about university processes. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 1 indexed citations
8.
Maidment, Jane & Beth R. Crisp. (2012). Not just for romance:. Groupwork. 17(2). 13–27. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ross, Michael W., Beth R. Crisp, Sven-Axel Månsson, & Sarah Hawkes. (2011). Occupational health and safety among commercial sex workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health. 38(2). 105–119. 59 indexed citations
10.
Crisp, Beth R.. (2010). Belonging, connectedness and social exclusion. Journal of Social Inclusion. 1(2). 123–132. 13 indexed citations
11.
Maidment, Jane & Beth R. Crisp. (2010). The Impact of Emotions on Practicum Learning. Social Work Education. 30(4). 408–421. 25 indexed citations
12.
Moriarty, Jo, Jill Manthorpe, Martin Stevens, et al.. (2010). A depth of data: research messages on the state of social work education in England. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 10 indexed citations
13.
Crisp, Beth R.. (2010). Catholic Agencies: Making a Distinct Contribution to Australian Social Welfare Provision?. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 87(4). 440–451. 5 indexed citations
14.
Orme, Joan, Gillian MacIntyre, Pam Green Lister, et al.. (2008). Evaluation of the new social work degree qualification in England. Volume 1 : findings. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 22 indexed citations
15.
Orme, Joan, Gillian MacIntyre, Pam Green Lister, et al.. (2007). What (a) Difference a Degree Makes: The Evaluation of the New Social Work Degree in England. The British Journal of Social Work. 39(1). 161–178. 47 indexed citations
16.
Crisp, Beth R., Mark V. Williams, Michael W. Ross, & Sandra C. Timpson. (2006). The impact of religious affiliation while growing up on substance use by African-American crack cocaine users. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 33(1). 90–100. 2 indexed citations
17.
Crisp, Beth R.. (2006). Gatekeeping or redressing social exclusion : expectations on social work educators in relation to incarcerated students. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 18(4). 4–10. 3 indexed citations
18.
Crisp, Beth R., Ian Anderson, Joan Orme, & Pam Green Lister. (2003). Learning and teaching in social work education: assessment. Volume 1 of knowledge review. 30(7). 733–4. 9 indexed citations
19.
Crisp, Beth R. & Hal Swerissen. (2002). Program, agency and effect sustainability in health promotion. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 13(2). 40–43. 8 indexed citations
20.
Swerissen, Hal, et al.. (2001). Health promotion and evaluation - a programmatic approach. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 11(1). 1–28. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026