Australian Social Work

1.7k papers and 16.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Australian Social Work in the last decades have received a total of 16.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian Social Work usually cover Public Administration (782 papers), General Health Professions (656 papers) and Clinical Psychology (462 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (771 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (271 papers) and Patient and Public Engagement in Healthcare Research (176 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Social Work are Philip Mendes, John Solas, Uschi Bay, Mark Hughes, Liz Beddoe, Rosemary Sheehan, Helen Cleak, Margaret Alston, Karen Healy and Robert Bland.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian Social Work

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Social Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Social Work.

Countries where authors publish in Australian Social Work

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Social Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Social Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Social Work more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025