Speech Language and Hearing

389 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 389 papers published in Speech Language and Hearing in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Speech Language and Hearing usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (145 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (125 papers) and Clinical Psychology (101 papers) specifically the topics of Language Development and Disorders (103 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (67 papers) and Stuttering Research and Treatment (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Speech Language and Hearing are Sharynne McLeod, Janet Baker, Lesley Wolk, Mary Rudner, Rohit Ravi, Gail Gillon, Thomas Lunner, Mary Louise Edwards, Jer­ker Rönnberg and Angus Macfarlane.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Speech Language and Hearing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Speech Language and Hearing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Speech Language and Hearing.

Countries where authors publish in Speech Language and Hearing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Speech Language and Hearing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Speech Language and Hearing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Speech Language and Hearing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025