This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sex Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sex Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sex Education more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sex Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sex Education.
About Sex Education
The 1.0k papers published in Sex Education in the last decades have received a total of 16.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Sex Education usually cover Gender Studies (541 papers), General Health Professions (553 papers) and Social Psychology (311 papers) specifically the topics of Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (524 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (341 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (295 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (222 papers), Sex work and related issues (156 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (142 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (138 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sex Education are Louisa Allen, Juliette D. G. Goldman, Tiffany Jones, Laina Y. Bay‐Cheng, Sheryl Clark, Roger Ingham, Jacqueline Ullman, Eleanor Formby, Renée DePalma and Julia Hirst.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.