Men and Masculinities

793 papers and 16.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 793 papers published in Men and Masculinities in the last decades have received a total of 16.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Men and Masculinities usually cover Gender Studies (546 papers), Sociology and Political Science (407 papers) and Clinical Psychology (76 papers) specifically the topics of Gender Roles and Identity Studies (373 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (187 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Men and Masculinities are Raewyn Connell, James W. Messerschmidt, Debbie Ging, Michael Flood, Karla Elliott, Gary Barker, Christine Beasley, Eric Anderson, Robert Morrell and Julie Pulerwitz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Men and Masculinities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Men and Masculinities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Men and Masculinities.

Countries where authors publish in Men and Masculinities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Men and Masculinities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Men and Masculinities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Men and Masculinities more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025