Research in the Teaching of English

1.0k papers and 19.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Research in the Teaching of English in the last decades have received a total of 19.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Research in the Teaching of English usually cover Education (456 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (396 papers) and Language and Linguistics (272 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (233 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (185 papers) and Literacy, Media, and Education (174 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research in the Teaching of English are Martin Nystrand, Anne Haas Dyson, John A. Daly, Sondra Perl, Glynda Hull, Michael D. Miller, Marion Crowhurst, Colette Daiute, N. Eleni Pappamihiel and Adam Gamoran.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Research in the Teaching of English

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research in the Teaching of English. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research in the Teaching of English.

Countries where authors publish in Research in the Teaching of English

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research in the Teaching of English. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research in the Teaching of English with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research in the Teaching of English more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025