Artificial Cells Nanomedicine and Biotechnology · 1×
×0.815k/17kMB
×1.36k/5kCR
×1.03k/3kONCOL
×1.03k/3kIMMUN
×1.32k/2kEPIDE
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters.
About Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
The 1.4k papers published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters in the last decades have received a total of 25.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters usually cover Cancer Research (277 papers), Molecular Biology (856 papers) and Cell Biology (134 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (133 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (115 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters are Tadeusz Rorat, Liqun Chen, Linyan Zhu, Małgorzata Witkowska-Zimny, Bořivoj Vojtěšek, Wojciech Białek, Philip J. Coates, Lin Guo, Chen Yang and Lin Ye.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.