ECNU Review of Education

357 papers and 2.4k indexed citations

About

The 357 papers published in ECNU Review of Education in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations. Papers published in ECNU Review of Education usually cover Education (203 papers), Sociology and Political Science (66 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (64 papers) specifically the topics of Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities (54 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (44 papers) and Global Educational Policies and Reforms (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ECNU Review of Education are Weipeng Yang, Jiahong Su, Xiaozhe Yang, Mark Bray, Deoksoon Kim, Wang Tao, Yong Zhao, Andreas Schleicher, Pak Tee Ng and Hongbiao Yin.

In The Last Decade

ECNU Review of Education

289 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Fields of papers published in ECNU Review of Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ECNU Review of Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ECNU Review of Education.

Countries where authors publish in ECNU Review of Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ECNU Review of Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ECNU Review of Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ECNU Review of Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026