Cultural Studies Review

386 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 386 papers published in Cultural Studies Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Cultural Studies Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (127 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (38 papers) and Geography, Planning and Development (33 papers) specifically the topics of Geographies of human-animal interactions (28 papers), Australian History and Society (19 papers) and Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cultural Studies Review are Isabelle Stengers, Kerry H. Robinson, Aileen Moreton‐Robinson, Susan Luckman, Clifton Evers, Anna Gibbs, Irene Watson, Bruno Latour, Chris Andersen and Graham Harman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cultural Studies Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cultural Studies Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cultural Studies Review.

Countries where authors publish in Cultural Studies Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cultural Studies Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cultural Studies Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cultural Studies Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025