Springer monographs in mathematics

252 papers and 26.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 252 papers published in Springer monographs in mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 26.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Springer monographs in mathematics usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (55 papers), Mathematical Physics (49 papers) and Geometry and Topology (48 papers) specifically the topics of Mathematics and Applications (14 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (14 papers) and Polynomial and algebraic computation (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Springer monographs in mathematics are Ludwig Arnold, Thierry Aubin, Viorel Barbu, Seán Dineen, Giovanni P. Galdi, Raymond A. Ryan, Andrzej Granas, J. Dugundji, Vladimir Peller and Francesco Mainardi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Springer monographs in mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Springer monographs in mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Springer monographs in mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in Springer monographs in mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Springer monographs in mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Springer monographs in mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Springer monographs in mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025