Win Tadd
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Demography top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Antony BayerAlexandra HillmanSimon ReadMichael CalnanRuth ChadwickPaul DieppeGillian WoolheadSergio Ariño‐Blasco
- Topics
- Patient Dignity and Privacy (15 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers)Ethics in medical practice (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSlovakiaSpain
In The Last Decade
Win Tadd
32 papers receiving 608 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 396
- General Health Professions 355
- Clinical Psychology 224
- Demography 52
- Psychiatry and Mental health 49
Countries citing papers authored by Win Tadd
This map shows the geographic impact of Win Tadd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Win Tadd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Win Tadd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Win Tadd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Win Tadd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Win Tadd. The network helps show where Win Tadd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Win Tadd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Win Tadd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Win Tadd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Win Tadd. Win Tadd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | Dignity in Practice: An exploration of the care of older adults in acute NHS Trusts | 67 |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 77 | |
| 6 | Views on dignity in providing health care for older people. | 26 |
| 7 | 72 | |
| 8 | 41 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Win Tadd
Win Tadd is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 32 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Dignity and Privacy (15 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (32 citations), Research and Theory (17 citations) and General Health Professions (355 citations). Win Tadd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovakia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Antony Bayer, Alexandra Hillman, Simon Read, Michael Calnan, Ruth Chadwick, Paul Dieppe, Gillian Woolhead, Sergio Ariño‐Blasco, Mike Calnan and Helena Leino‐Kilpi. Their work appears in journals such as Age and Ageing, Patient Education and Counseling and Nurse Education Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.