Journal of Human Rights Practice

497 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 497 papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice usually cover Sociology and Political Science (373 papers), Political Science and International Relations (197 papers) and Law (96 papers) specifically the topics of Human Rights and Development (171 papers), International Law and Human Rights (83 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Human Rights Practice are Mark Heywood, Tshepo Madlingozi, Stephen Hopgood, Philip Alston, Paul Gready, Luigi Bartolomei, Eileen Pittaway, Richard Hugman, Paul C. Gorski and Anna Lundberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Human Rights Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Human Rights Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Human Rights Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025