Pharmaceutical Sciences

475 papers and 3.2k indexed citations

About

The 475 papers published in Pharmaceutical Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmaceutical Sciences usually cover Molecular Biology (102 papers), Food Science (73 papers) and Plant Science (68 papers) specifically the topics of Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (41 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (35 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmaceutical Sciences are Abolghasem Jouyban, Yasser Shahbazi, Fleming Martínez, William E. Acree, Hamed Hamishehkar, Saeed Ghanbarzadeh, Reza Heidari, Mehran Alavi, Mojtaba Taran and Maryam Shayani Rad.

In The Last Decade

Pharmaceutical Sciences

427 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Countries where authors publish in Pharmaceutical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmaceutical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmaceutical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmaceutical Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Pharmaceutical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmaceutical Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026