Education for Chemical Engineers

442 papers and 4.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 442 papers published in Education for Chemical Engineers in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Education for Chemical Engineers usually cover Media Technology (225 papers), Education (206 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (90 papers) specifically the topics of Experimental Learning in Engineering (145 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (105 papers) and Problem and Project Based Learning (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Education for Chemical Engineers are David Shallcross, Joey Mark S. Diaz, Lorico DS. Lapitan, Edmond P. Byrne, Kenneth Davey, Jarka Glassey, Konstantinos E. Kakosimos, Clemens Brechtelsbauer, Umang V. Shah and Brent R. Young.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Education for Chemical Engineers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Education for Chemical Engineers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Education for Chemical Engineers.

Countries where authors publish in Education for Chemical Engineers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Education for Chemical Engineers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Education for Chemical Engineers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Education for Chemical Engineers more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025