Language Testing in Asia

364 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 364 papers published in Language Testing in Asia in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Language Testing in Asia usually cover Education (198 papers), Language and Linguistics (155 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (143 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (146 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (145 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (91 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Language Testing in Asia are Nasreen Sultana, Robert Kirkpatrick, Liying Cheng, Ying Zheng, Tahereh Heydarnejad, David Allen, Hassan Mohebbi, Ehsan Namaziandost, Tribhuwan Kumar and Christine Coombe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Language Testing in Asia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Language Testing in Asia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Language Testing in Asia.

Countries where authors publish in Language Testing in Asia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Language Testing in Asia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Language Testing in Asia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Language Testing in Asia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025