Juvenile and Family Court Journal

653 papers and 4.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 653 papers published in Juvenile and Family Court Journal in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Juvenile and Family Court Journal usually cover Clinical Psychology (290 papers), Sociology and Political Science (263 papers) and Safety Research (210 papers) specifically the topics of Child Welfare and Adoption (195 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (176 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (171 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Juvenile and Family Court Journal are Frank W. Putnam, Shantel Crosby, Mark S. Umbreit, Christopher Lasch, Steven Schlossman, Peter G. Jaffe, James C. Howell, Stanley E. Crawford, Claire V. Crooks and José B. Ashford.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Juvenile and Family Court Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Juvenile and Family Court Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Juvenile and Family Court Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Juvenile and Family Court Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Juvenile and Family Court Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Juvenile and Family Court Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juvenile and Family Court Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025