Focaal

561 papers and 3.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 561 papers published in Focaal in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Focaal usually cover Sociology and Political Science (281 papers), Political Science and International Relations (178 papers) and Anthropology (86 papers) specifically the topics of Anthropological Studies and Insights (51 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (33 papers) and Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Focaal are A. Visser, John Clarke, Mathijs Pelkmans, Daniel M. Knight, Dinah Rajak, Κατερίνα Ροζάκου, Ida Susser, Stef Jansen, Élise Demeulenaere and Halleh Ghorashi.

In The Last Decade

Focaal

435 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Focaal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Focaal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Focaal.

Countries where authors publish in Focaal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Focaal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Focaal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Focaal more than expected).

Postsocialism: Ideals, ideologies, and practices in Eurasia 2002 2026 2010 2018 256
  1. Postsocialism: Ideals, ideologies, and practices in Eurasia (2002)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026