Genes and Environment

485 papers and 4.1k indexed citations

About

The 485 papers published in Genes and Environment in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Genes and Environment usually cover Molecular Biology (243 papers), Cancer Research (229 papers) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (97 papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (197 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (111 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Genes and Environment are Makoto Hayashi, Masamitsu Honma, Hiroshi Kasai, Shizuyo Sutou, Hiroyuki Kamiya, Takehiko Nohmi, Kazuaki Kawai, Tetsuya Suzuki, Takashi Yagi and Kenichi Masumura.

In The Last Decade

Genes and Environment

443 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Genes and Environment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Genes and Environment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Genes and Environment.

Countries where authors publish in Genes and Environment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Genes and Environment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Genes and Environment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genes and Environment more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026