Applied Superconductivity

486 papers and 3.6k indexed citations

About

The 486 papers published in Applied Superconductivity in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Superconductivity usually cover Condensed Matter Physics (404 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (147 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (144 papers) specifically the topics of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (401 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (126 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Superconductivity are M. Murakami, L. Dresner, Z. Han, T. Freltoft, Shi Xue Dou, Hiroshi Ikuta, Masami Murakami, Huan Liu, G. N. Riley and Masaaki Yoshikawa.

In The Last Decade

Applied Superconductivity

462 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Applied Superconductivity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Superconductivity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Superconductivity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Superconductivity more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Applied Superconductivity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Superconductivity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Superconductivity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026